Literature DB >> 15543072

The assessment of intraobserver and interobserver error in the measurement of noncongenital scoliosis in children < or = 10 years of age.

Randall T Loder1, David Spiegel, Sarah Gutknecht, Kenneth Kleist, Thuan Ly, Amir Mehbod.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of scoliosis radiographs.
OBJECTIVES: To determine measurement variability in children < or = 10 years of age with noncongenital scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Measurement variability in congenital and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has been studied. There is no study of measurement variability in young children with noncongenital scoliosis.
METHODS: A retrospective review of children < or = 10 years of age followed for noncongenital scoliosis was performed. End vertebrae were identified on radiographs, and the curves were measured (Cobb method) twice by each of six observers. The same soft lead pencil and goniometer was used. Intraobserver and interobserver variability for continuous data was determined.
RESULTS: There were 64 children. The diagnosis was infantile/juvenile idiopathic scoliosis in 42, neuromuscular scoliosis in 7, scoliosis associated with mesenchymal disorders or other syndromes in 12, and unknown in 3 children. The curve was thoracic in 54, thoracolumbar in 8, and lumbar in 2. There were 19 left and 45 right curves. The average age was 6.6 +/- 2.6 years. There were a total of 768 Cobb angle measurements with an average Cobb angle of 38 +/- 22 degrees (range, 10 degrees -115 degrees ). Intraobserver variability was +/- 6 degrees; interobserver variability was +/- 7 degrees.
CONCLUSION: In children < or =10 years of age with noncongenital scoliosis, intraobserver measurement variability in Cobb angle measurement is +/- 6 degrees and interobserver variability is +/-7 degrees. To be certain that there is a significant difference between Cobb angle measurements in children with noncongenital scoliosis and < or = 10 years of age there must be a change of at least +/-7 degrees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15543072     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000144828.72721.d8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  A comparative study of axis-line-distance technique and Cobb method on assessing the curative effect on scoliosis.

Authors:  Jia-Wei He; Guang-Hui Bai; Xin-Jian Ye; Kun Liu; Zhi-Han Yan; Xian Zhang; Xiang-Yang Wang; Yi-Xing Huang; Zhi-Kang Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of cobb angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Shannon Allen; Eric Parent; Maziyar Khorasani; Douglas L Hill; Edmond Lou; James V Raso
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The validity and reliability of "Spinal Mouse" assessment of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in pediatric adolescent idiopathic thoraco-lumbar curves.

Authors:  Ayse Livanelioglu; Fatma Kaya; Vugar Nabiyev; Gokhan Demirkiran; Tüzün Fırat
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Computer-aided assessment of scoliosis on posteroanterior radiographs.

Authors:  Junhua Zhang; Edmond Lou; Douglas L Hill; James V Raso; Yuanyuan Wang; Lawrence H Le; Xinling Shi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Comparison between Oxford Cobbmeter and digital Cobbmeter for measurement of Cobb angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Yasser Allam; Tarek El-Fiky; Mahmoud Yasser Farghally; Sameh Al-Sabagh; Ahmed Ezzat Siam
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Observer reliability between juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in measurement of stable Cobb's angle.

Authors:  Hitesh N Modi; Ting Chen; Seung Woo Suh; Satyen Mehta; S Srinivasalu; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Hae-Ryong Song
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Radiographic study of the acetabulum and proximal femur between 1 and 3 years of age.

Authors:  Pedro Gutiérrez Carbonell; D Bustamante Suárez de Puga; J Roca Vicente-Franqueira; A Lajarín Ortuño
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Oxford Cobbometer Versus Computer Assisted-Software for Measurement of Cobb Angle in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Tarek Elfiky; Nirmal Patil; Mohamed Shawky; Ahmed Siam; Raafat Ragab; Yasser Allam
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2020-02-01

10.  [Is it possible to improve treatment safety in the brace treatment of scoliosis patients by using standardized CAD algorithms?]

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Manuel Lay; Sarah Seibel; Alexander Kleban
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.