Literature DB >> 15706343

Reliability analysis for manual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.

Timothy R Kuklo1, Benjamin K Potter, David W Polly, Michael F O'Brien, Teresa M Schroeder, Lawrence G Lenke.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Manual radiographic measurement analysis.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of numerous radiographic process measures used in the assessment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Analysis of scoliosis requires a thorough radiographic evaluation to completely assess the deformity. Numerous radiographic process measures have been studied extensively and used for outcomes assessment and thus become the de facto standard of care. However, many of these measures have not been evaluated to determine the reliability and reproducibility. Validation of radiographic process measures is necessary to compare these measures with patient-focused outcome measures, as well as to permit valid comparison of different surgical techniques.
METHODS: Thirty complete sets of long-cassette scoliosis radiographs (anteroposterior [AP], lateral and side-bending preoperative and AP, and lateral postoperative) were analyzed by three independent experienced observers on two separate occasions. Coronal image measures included the coronal Cobb angles, side-bending Cobb, apical vertebral translation, coronal balance, T1 tilt, lowest instrumented vertebrae (LIV) tilt, angulation of the disc below the LIV, apical vertebral rotation (Nash-Moe),and Risser sign; sagittal measures included T2-T5, T5-T12, T2-T12, T10-L2, T12-S1, and sagittal balance. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for each measure was then assessed.
RESULTS: The vast majority of the radiographic process measures assessed demonstrated good to excellent or excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability. However, the angulation of the disc below the LIV demonstrated only fair interobserver reliability for postoperative measurements (rho = 0.59). Likewise, Risser grade measurements reflected good intraobserver (0.81-0.99) but only fair interobserver reliability (0.60-0.70). Apical vertebral rotation assessed by the technique of Nash and Moe produced good intraobserver reliability before surgery (0.74-0.85) but only fair reliability after surgery (0.50-0.85). The interobserver reliability for apical Nash-Moe rotation was fair to poor (0.53-0.59). For T2-T5 regional kyphosis, intraobserver (0.22-0.83) and interobserver (0.33-0.47) reliability was generally poor. Overall, the reliability of postoperative measurements tended to be decreased relative to preoperative values, likely due to instrumentation overlying radiographic landmarks.
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the radiographic process measures evaluated in this study demonstrated good or excellent reliability. The reliability of measuring the angulation of the disc below the LIV, the apical Nash-Moe rotation, and Risser grading was decreased relative to other measures. The reliability of measuring T2-T5 regional kyphosis was disappointing and poor. With regards to the other 13 measures assessed, our findings support the use of these process measures obtained by experienced deformity surgeons via manual measurement for routine clinical and academic purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15706343     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000153702.99342.9c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  31 in total

1.  A comparative study of axis-line-distance technique and Cobb method on assessing the curative effect on scoliosis.

Authors:  Jia-Wei He; Guang-Hui Bai; Xin-Jian Ye; Kun Liu; Zhi-Han Yan; Xian Zhang; Xiang-Yang Wang; Yi-Xing Huang; Zhi-Kang Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Reliable and reproducible classification system for scoliotic radiograph using image processing techniques.

Authors:  H Anitha; G K Prabhu; A K Karunakar
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Identification of apical vertebra for grading of idiopathic scoliosis using image processing.

Authors:  H Anitha; G K Prabhu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Predictive factors for a distal adjacent disorder with L3 as the lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke 5C patients.

Authors:  Kei Ando; Shiro Imagama; Zenya Ito; Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Tetsuro Hida; Kenyu Ito; Akito Tsushima; Yoshimoto Ishikawa; Akiyuki Matsumoto; Yoshihiro Nishida; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-01

6.  Coronal plane segmental flexibility in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis assessed by fulcrum-bending radiographs.

Authors:  Carol-Claudius Hasler; Fritz Hefti; Philippe Büchler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Radiographic versus ultrasound evaluation of the Risser Grade in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study of 46 patients.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Gerhard Kaufmann; Iris Steingruber; Eckart Mayr; Michael Liebensteiner; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Criteria for successful correction of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in AIS patients: results of risk model calculations using target outcomes and failure analysis.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison between Oxford Cobbmeter and digital Cobbmeter for measurement of Cobb angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Yasser Allam; Tarek El-Fiky; Mahmoud Yasser Farghally; Sameh Al-Sabagh; Ahmed Ezzat Siam
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  The effect of intra-operative skeletal (skull femoral) traction on apical vertebral rotation.

Authors:  Subir N Jhaveri; Reinhard Zeller; Stephen Miller; Stephen J Lewis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.