Literature DB >> 19034504

Perceptual scaling of voice identity: common dimensions for different vowels and speakers.

Oliver Baumann1, Pascal Belin.   

Abstract

THE AIMS OF OUR STUDY WERE: (1) to determine if the acoustical parameters used by normal subjects to discriminate between different speakers vary when comparisons are made between pairs of two of the same or different vowels, and if they are different for male and female voices; (2) to ask whether individual voices can reasonably be represented as points in a low-dimensional perceptual space such that similarly sounding voices are located close to one another. Subjects were presented with pairs of voices from 16 male and 16 female speakers uttering the three French vowels "a", "i" and "u" and asked to give speaker similarity judgments. Multidimensional analyses of the similarity matrices were performed separately for male and female voices and for three types of comparisons: same vowels, different vowels and overall average. The resulting dimensions were then interpreted a posteriori in terms of relevant acoustical measures. For both male and female voices, a two-dimensional perceptual space was found to be most appropriate, with axes largely corresponding to contributions of the larynx (pitch) and supra-laryngeal vocal tract (formants), mirroring the two largely independent components of source and filter in voice production. These perceptual spaces of male and female voices and their corresponding voice samples are available at: http://vnl.psy.gla.ac.uk section Resources.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19034504     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0185-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  17 in total

1.  Acoustic parameters in human speaker recognition.

Authors:  W A van Dommelen
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1990 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  Individual differences in voice quality perception.

Authors:  J Kreiman; B R Gerratt; K Precoda; G S Berke
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-06

3.  Voice spectrograms as a function of age, voice disguise, and voice imitation.

Authors:  W Endres; W Bambach; G Flösser
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparison of techniques for discriminating among talkers.

Authors:  F R Clarke; R W Becker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1969-12

5.  Harmonics-to-noise ratio and psychophysical measurement of the degree of hoarseness.

Authors:  E Yumoto; Y Sasaki; H Okamura
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1984-03

6.  Correlates of psychological dimensions in talker similarity.

Authors:  B E Walden; A A Montgomery; G J Gibeily; R A Prosek; D M Schwartz
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-06

7.  Vocal shimmer in sustained phonation.

Authors:  Y Horii
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1980-03

Review 8.  Speaker recognition. An interpretive survey of the literature.

Authors:  M H Hecker
Journal:  ASHA Monogr       Date:  1971-01

9.  Men's voices and women's choices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Women use voice parameters to assess men's characteristics.

Authors:  Laetitia Bruckert; Jean-Sylvain Liénard; André Lacroix; Michel Kreutzer; Gérard Leboucher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  36 in total

1.  Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Padma D Sampath; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Recognition of accented English in quiet and noise by younger and older listeners.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Peter J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self-generated and nonself voices: An ERP study.

Authors:  Tatiana Conde; Óscar F Gonçalves; Ana P Pinheiro
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  The impact of musical training and tone language experience on talker identification.

Authors:  Xin Xie; Emily Myers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perception of speech in noise: neural correlates.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Karen Banai; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Context-dependent encoding in the auditory brainstem subserves enhanced speech-in-noise perception in musicians.

Authors:  A Parbery-Clark; D L Strait; N Kraus
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Acoustic and linguistic factors affecting perceptual dissimilarity judgments of voices.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Kristina T Furbeck; Emily J Thurston
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Acoustic voice variation within and between speakers.

Authors:  Yoonjeong Lee; Patricia Keating; Jody Kreiman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Towards understanding speaker discrimination abilities in humans and machines for text-independent short utterances of different speech styles.

Authors:  Soo Jin Park; Gary Yeung; Neda Vesselinova; Jody Kreiman; Patricia A Keating; Abeer Alwan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Talker identification across source mechanisms: experiments with laryngeal and electrolarynx speech.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Cara E Stepp; Robert E Hillman; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.