Literature DB >> 703276

Correlates of psychological dimensions in talker similarity.

B E Walden, A A Montgomery, G J Gibeily, R A Prosek, D M Schwartz.   

Abstract

This investigation identifies correlates of psychological dimensions in talker similarity. Twenty adult male talkers recorded a monosyllabic word, and 13 acoustic measurements were made from spectrograms of each talker's production. All possible pairs of voices were presented to 11 adult listeners for similarity judgments via a paired-comparison paradigm. A four-dimensional INDSCAL analysis of the similarity ratings was employed to derive psychological dimensions of talker similarity. Correlations between the acoustic measurements and the INDSCAL dimensions revealed that fundamental frequency and word duration were moderately correlated with two of the psychological dimensions. The other two dimensions were not convincingly correlated with any of the acoustic measurements, but are best described as representing voice quality and talker age. A listener's familiarity with the talkers did not seem to influence his judgment of voice similarity.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 703276     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2102.265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  9 in total

1.  Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.

Authors:  Sonya M Sheffert; David B Pisoni; Jennifer M Fellowes; Robert E Remez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Differential influence of frequency, timing, and intensity cues in a complex acoustic categorization task.

Authors:  Katherine I Nagel; Helen M McLendon; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Perceptual similarity of regional dialects of American English.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; Susannah V Levi; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual scaling of voice identity: common dimensions for different vowels and speakers.

Authors:  Oliver Baumann; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-26

5.  Acoustic voice variation within and between speakers.

Authors:  Yoonjeong Lee; Patricia Keating; Jody Kreiman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The self-advantage in visual speech processing enhances audiovisual speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent P Spehar; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

Review 7.  A bird brain's view of auditory processing and perception.

Authors:  Katherine Nagel; Gunsoo Kim; Helen McLendon; Allison Doupe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Face-voice space: Integrating visual and auditory cues in judgments of person distinctiveness.

Authors:  Joshua R Tatz; Zehra F Peynircioğlu; William Brent
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Active listening.

Authors:  Karl J Friston; Noor Sajid; David Ricardo Quiroga-Martinez; Thomas Parr; Cathy J Price; Emma Holmes
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.208

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.