Literature DB >> 6717002

Harmonics-to-noise ratio and psychophysical measurement of the degree of hoarseness.

E Yumoto, Y Sasaki, H Okamura.   

Abstract

The degree of hoarseness can be evaluated by judging the extent to which noise replaces the harmonic structure in the spectrogram . The relationship between these two components was quantified as the harmonics-to-noise (H/N) ratio. Eighty-seven phonatory samples (sustained vowel /a/), ranging from nearly normal to severely hoarse, were analyzed. The H/N ratio, the spectrographic classification, and cycle-to-cycle pitch perturbations (jitter) each showed a significant correlation with the psychophysical measurement of the degree of hoarseness (r = .809, .805, and .712, respectively; p less than .001). The analysis also revealed that the correlations of the psychophysical measurement of the degree of hoarseness with the first two parameters were significantly higher than that with jitter (p less than .05). Moreover, the spectrographic classification is subjective, and its scale is discrete and coarse. Therefore, the H/N ratio seems to be the most applicable in the clinic as a quantitative index of the degree of hoarseness.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6717002     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2701.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  10 in total

1.  Perceptual scaling of voice identity: common dimensions for different vowels and speakers.

Authors:  Oliver Baumann; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-26

2.  A study of sounds produced by Algerian esophageal speakers.

Authors:  K Ferrat; M Guerti
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Feature analysis of pathological speech signals using local discriminant bases technique.

Authors:  K Umapathy; S Krishnan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; William J Bologna; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Analysis of factors influencing voice quality and therapeutic approaches in vocal polyp patients.

Authors:  Kwang Jae Cho; Inn Chul Nam; Yeon Shin Hwang; Mi Ran Shim; Jun Ook Park; Jung Hae Cho; Young Hoon Joo; Min Sik Kim; Dong Il Sun
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Validation of an Acoustic-Based Framework of Speech Motor Control: Assessing Criterion and Construct Validity Using Kinematic and Perceptual Measures.

Authors:  Hannah P Rowe; Kaila L Stipancic; Adam C Lammert; Jordan R Green
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 2.674

7.  Objective acoustic analysis of voice improvement after phonosurgery.

Authors:  Piyush Verma; Manisha Pal; Anoop Raj
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-09-24

8.  Work-related communicative profile of radio broadcasters: a case study.

Authors:  Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva; Pasquale Bottalico; Eric Hunter
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 1.487

9.  The Effect of Masks and Respirators on Acoustic Voice Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Ebru Karakaya Gojayev; Zahide Çiler Büyükatalay; Tuğba Akyüz; Mustafa Rehan; Gürsel Dursun
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Subcortical Effects on Voice and Fluency in Dysarthria: Observations from Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation.

Authors:  Diana Sidtis; John J Sidtis
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis Parkinsonism       Date:  2017-10-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.