Literature DB >> 21864552

Context-dependent encoding in the auditory brainstem subserves enhanced speech-in-noise perception in musicians.

A Parbery-Clark1, D L Strait, N Kraus.   

Abstract

Musical training strengthens speech perception in the presence of background noise. Given that the ability to make use of speech sound regularities, such as pitch, underlies perceptual acuity in challenging listening environments, we asked whether musicians' enhanced speech-in-noise perception is facilitated by increased neural sensitivity to acoustic regularities. To this aim we examined subcortical encoding of the same speech syllable presented in predictable and variable conditions and speech-in-noise perception in 31 musicians and nonmusicians. We anticipated that musicians would demonstrate greater neural enhancement of speech presented in the predictable compared to the variable condition than nonmusicians. Accordingly, musicians demonstrated more robust neural encoding of the fundamental frequency (i.e., pitch) of speech presented in the predictable relative to the variable condition than nonmusicians. The degree of neural enhancement observed to predictable speech correlated with subjects' musical practice histories as well as with their speech-in-noise perceptual abilities. Taken together, our findings suggest that subcortical sensitivity to speech regularities is shaped by musical training and may contribute to musicians' enhanced speech-in-noise perception.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21864552      PMCID: PMC3445334          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  92 in total

1.  The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences: attunement, referent period, focal attending.

Authors:  C Drake; M R Jones; C Baruch
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-12-15

2.  Auditory organization of sound sequences by a temporal or numerical regularity--a mismatch negativity study comparing musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Titia L van Zuijen; Elyse Sussman; István Winkler; Risto Näätänen; Mari Tervaniemi
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-23

3.  Individual differences in voice quality perception.

Authors:  J Kreiman; B R Gerratt; K Precoda; G S Berke
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-06

4.  Corticofugal modulation of initial sound processing in the brain.

Authors:  Feng Luo; Qianzhou Wang; Alireza Kashani; Jun Yan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.

Authors:  M Tervaniemi; S Kruck; W De Baene; E Schröger; K Alter; A D Friederici
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential.

Authors:  I Winkler; G Karmos; R Näätänen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1996-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  The mismatch negativity in evaluating central auditory dysfunction in dyslexia.

Authors:  T Kujala; R Näätänen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Differential dynamic plasticity of A1 receptive fields during multiple spectral tasks.

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Mounya Elhilali; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Erika Skoe; Carrie Lam; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Subcortical processing of speech regularities underlies reading and music aptitude in children.

Authors:  Dana L Strait; Jane Hornickel; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.759

View more
  39 in total

1.  Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Viorica Marian; Anthony Shook; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Interactive effects of linguistic abstraction and stimulus statistics in the online modulation of neural speech encoding.

Authors:  Joseph C Y Lau; Patrick C M Wong; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Functional Interplay Between the Putative Measures of Rostral and Caudal Efferent Regulation of Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Sandeep Maruthy; U Ajith Kumar; G Nike Gnanateja
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-26

4.  Speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses reflect familial and cognitive influences.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Deborah Lin; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-01

5.  Musicians' enhanced neural differentiation of speech sounds arises early in life: developmental evidence from ages 3 to 30.

Authors:  Dana L Strait; Samantha O'Connell; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Age-related changes in the relationship between auditory brainstem responses and envelope-following responses.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Jyotishka Datta; Julie Ann Luna Torres; Charneka Hopkins; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21

7.  Dysfunction of Rapid Neural Adaptation in Dyslexia.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Stephanie N Del Tufo; Rebecca Winter; Jack Murtagh; Abigail Cyr; Patricia Chang; Kelly Halverson; Satrajit S Ghosh; Joanna A Christodoulou; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; Valerie S Knopik; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Cortical and subcortical processing of short duration speech stimuli in trained rock musicians: a pilot study.

Authors:  Prawin Kumar; Sam Publius Anil; Vibhu Grover; Himanshu Kumar Sanju; Sachchidanand Sinha
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Biological impact of preschool music classes on processing speech in noise.

Authors:  Dana L Strait; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Samantha O'Connell; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 6.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.