Literature DB >> 19020809

Comparison of the quality score of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude values measured by the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer.

S Pourjavan1, P Boghossian, M Detry-Morel.   

Abstract

The Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (PDCT) is designed to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) largely independent of the corneal properties. It is equipped with a digital LCD screen that displays the IOP, the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) and the quality score (Q) of the measurements [range 1 (excellent) to 5 (poor)]. The manufacturer has recommended discarding the IOP and OPA values of Q4 and Q5. The aim of our study was to assess if IOP and OPA measurements with Q3 are acceptable for clinical and research purposes. This is a prospective, observational study in which both patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma and healthy subjects were enrolled; three consecutive PDCT IOP measurements were performed on all participants. Only patients and subjects with Q1, Q2 and Q3 recorded together were eligible. Only one eye per subject was considered for statistical analysis. The mean PDCT IOP and OPA were taken for statistical analyses. An ANOVA test for repeated measures was used to compare the differences between PDCT IOP and OPA Q1, Q2, and Q3 scores. A total of 87 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Mean PDCT (+/-SD) IOP were 17.5 +/- 3.4 mmHg for Q1, 17.6 +/- 3.3 mmHg for Q2 and 17.9 +/- 3.3 mmHg for Q3 (P > 0.05). Mean OPA Q1, Q2 and Q3 were 2.5 +/- 0.9, 2.5 +/- 1.0 and 2.5 +/- 1.0 mmHg, respectively, and were not statistically different. Based on these results, we concluded that the IOP and OPA values with Q1, Q2 or Q3 measured by PDCT are not significantly different and can therefore be taken into account indiscriminately for clinical and research purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19020809     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-008-9280-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  20 in total

1.  The short-term effect of latanoprost on intraocular pressure and pulsatile ocular blood flow.

Authors:  Gerasimos T Georgopoulos; Michael Diestelhorst; Robert Fisher; Peter Ruokonen; Guenter K Krieglstein
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2002-02

2.  Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer.

Authors:  Hartmut E Kanngiesser; Christoph Kniestedt; Yves C A Robert
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Pachymetry before or after applanation tonometry: does it matter?

Authors:  S Pourjavan; C Deghislage; L Van Malderen; T Zeyen
Journal:  Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol       Date:  2005

4.  Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) - a comparison of agreement and reproducibility.

Authors:  Sonja Herdener; Mona Pache; Sonja Lautebach; Jens Funk
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.

Authors:  A Kotecha; E T White; J M Shewry; D F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Ocular pulse amplitude in patients with open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma, and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  O Schwenn; R Troost; A Vogel; F Grus; S Beck; N Pfeiffer
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  [Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer].

Authors:  M Detry-Morel; J Jamart; M B Detry; A Ledoux; S Pourjavan
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 0.818

9.  Dynamic contour tonometry and goldman applanation tonometry in eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Jackson Barreto; Mirko Babic; Roberto Murad Vessani; Remo Susanna
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry.

Authors:  Esther M Hoffmann; Franz-H Grus; Norbert Pfeiffer
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03-23       Impact factor: 2.209

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dynamic contour tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lens.

Authors:  Andrew K C Lam; Jimmy S H Tse
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2013-08-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.