Literature DB >> 16148581

Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer.

Hartmut E Kanngiesser1, Christoph Kniestedt, Yves C A Robert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: With tonometers currently in use intraocular pressure is indirectly determined by measuring a physical quantity related to a specified deformation of the cornea. We present a new principle of direct, continuous, and transcorneal intraocular pressure measurement, describe its theoretical foundation, and evaluate its application on the basis of an in vitro model.
METHODS: On a living human eye an optimized pressure-sensitive contact surface was determined by performing pressure measurements with differently shaped tonometer heads. Based on these results and on the theoretical model, a Dynamic Contour Tonometer was constructed and validated on eye bank bulbi against a manometric reference pressure.
RESULTS: A concave contact surface with a radius of curvature of 10.5 mm creates a distribution of forces between the central contour matching area of the tip and the cornea that equals the forces generated by the internal pressure of the eye. A sensor integrated into the surface having the same contour measures the intraocular pressure closely to the manometric reference pressure in human cadaver eyes. The accuracy of the tonometer appears to be unaffected by variations in corneal properties.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic Contour Tonometry eliminates most of the systematic errors arising from individual changes of corneal properties that adversely influence all types of applanation tonometers. The advantage of measuring the true pressure in combination with the capability of registering dynamic pressure fluctuations discloses new tonometric opportunities to diagnose and classify different types of glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16148581     DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000176936.16015.4e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  44 in total

1.  Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude variations during the Valsalva maneuver.

Authors:  Umit Aykan; Mesut Erdurmus; Burhan Yilmaz; Ahmet Hamdi Bilge
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Repeatability of intra-ocular pressure and central corneal thickness measurements provided by a non-contact method of tonometry and pachymetry.

Authors:  Domenico Schiano Lomoriello; Marco Lombardo; Laura Tranchina; Francesco Oddone; Sebastiano Serrao; Pietro Ducoli
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Age-dependency of ocular parameters: a cross sectional study of young and elderly healthy subjects.

Authors:  G Jóhannesson; P Hallberg; K Ambarki; A Eklund; C Lindén
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  [Dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  C Kniestedt; H E Kanngiesser
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Fatih Özcura; Nilgün Yildirim; Afsun Şahin; Ertuğrul Çolak
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  The short-term influence of exercise on axial length and intraocular pressure.

Authors:  S A Read; M J Collins
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Limbal rebound tonometry: clinical comparisons and applications.

Authors:  Georgios Bontzos; Michail Agiorgiotakis; Zoi Kapsala; Efstathios Detorakis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Physiological diurnal variability and characteristics of the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) with the dynamic contour tonometer (DCT-Pascal).

Authors:  Sayeh Pourjavan; Pierre-Yves Boëlle; Michéle Detry-Morel; Patrick De Potter
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry in a population of Mexican open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  J Jimenez-Roman; F Gil-Carrasco; A Martinez; O Albis-Donado; J D De la Torre-Tovar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Jooeun Lee; Chang Hwan Lee; Jaewan Choi; Sam Young Yoon; Kyung Rim Sung; Seong Bae Park; Michael S Kook
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.