Literature DB >> 19015507

Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task.

Julie M Bugg1, Larry L Jacoby, Jeffrey P Toth.   

Abstract

Multiple levels of control may be used in service of reducing Stroop interference. One is list-wide, whereby interference is reduced strategically in lists that include disproportionately more incongruent trials. A second, item-specific control is observed when proportion congruence is manipulated at the level of items. Item-specific control reduces interference for mostly incongruent relative to mostly congruent items. First, we show that item-specific control may drive both list-wide and item-specific proportion congruence effects (Experiment 1). We then show that item-specific control affects Stroop interference similarly when a single feature (a word) as opposed to a feature combination (a word+font type) signals proportion congruence (Experiment 2). Although this suggests that font type offers little advantage for controlling Stroop interference beyond the word, a novel, font-specific proportion congruence effect is observed in Experiment 3, indicating that font type can be used to control interference. These findings support the idea that multiple levels of control are used in reducing Stroop interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19015507      PMCID: PMC2682765          DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.8.1484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  21 in total

1.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  C S Carter; A M Macdonald; M Botvinick; L L Ross; V A Stenger; D Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Item-specific control of automatic processes: stroop process dissociations.

Authors:  Larry L Jacoby; D Stephen Lindsay; Sandra Hessels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

Review 3.  Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects.

Authors:  Robert D Melara; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words.

Authors:  J Tzelgov; A Henik; J Berger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

Review 5.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  J D Cohen; K Dunbar; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  An auditory analog of the Stroop Test.

Authors:  R E Shor
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1975-10

8.  The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.

Authors:  James R Schmidt; Derek Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Implicit learning of color-word associations using a Stroop paradigm.

Authors:  G Musen; L R Squire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Selective and divided Attention in a Stroop task.

Authors:  D G Lowe; J O Mitterer
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1982-12
View more
  56 in total

1.  Proactive control of irrelevant task rules during cued task switching.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-28

2.  Activation of context-specific attentional control sets by exogenous allocation of visual attention to the context?

Authors:  Caroline Gottschalk; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-05

Review 3.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

4.  List-wide control is not entirely elusive: evidence from picture-word Stroop.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Swati Chanani
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

5.  The next trial will be conflicting! Effects of explicit congruency pre-cues on cognitive control.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Alicia Smallwood
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-19

6.  Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Olga Entel; Joseph Tzelgov; Yoella Bereby-Meyer; Nitzan Shahar
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-25

Review 7.  Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

8.  Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Olga Entel; Joseph Tzelgov
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-12-03

Review 9.  Questioning conflict adaptation: proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

10.  The effects of awareness and secondary task demands on Stroop performance in the pre-cued lists paradigm.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Nathaniel T Diede
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2017-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.