Literature DB >> 1435275

Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words.

J Tzelgov1, A Henik, J Berger.   

Abstract

An important characteristic of automatic processing is its uncontrollability. The Stroop phenomenon is regarded as a prototypical example of this characteristic of automatic processing, hence, the Stroop effect should not change when the percentages of color words versus neutral stimuli are manipulated to induce controlled processing. We found that Stroop interference decreased as the percentage of color words increased. Furthermore, the magnitude of the inhibitory component of the Stroop effect was negatively correlated with the percentage of color words; the facilitatory component was insensitive to the manipulation. These results suggest that the Stroop effect is controllable (see Logan, 1980) and that the locus of control is postlexical. The results also suggest that facilitation and inhibition are produced by different mechanisms and challenge those models of the Stroop phenomenon (e.g., Cohen, Dunbar, & McClelland, 1990; Phaf, Van der Heijden, & Hudson, 1990) that assume that a single processing mechanism causes facilitation and inhibition and that control affects facilitation and inhibition alike (Logan, 1980).

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1435275     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  21 in total

1.  SLAM: a connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks.

Authors:  R H Phaf; A H Van der Heijden; P T Hudson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes.

Authors:  J Cheesman; P M Merikle
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1986-12

3.  Verbal interference with encoding in a perceptual classification task.

Authors:  H S Hock; H Egeth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-02

4.  A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.

Authors:  K Dunbar; C M MacLeod
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  D Kahneman; D Chajczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.

Authors:  M O Glaser; W R Glaser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The effects of effort on stroop interference.

Authors:  D P MacKinnon; R E Geiselman; J A Woodward
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1985-03

8.  Selective attention and priming: inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes.

Authors:  S P Tipper; M Cranston
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-11

9.  The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects.

Authors:  S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-11

10.  Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: theory and data.

Authors:  G D Logan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  76 in total

1.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  C S Carter; A M Macdonald; M Botvinick; L L Ross; V A Stenger; D Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Item-specific control of automatic processes: stroop process dissociations.

Authors:  Larry L Jacoby; D Stephen Lindsay; Sandra Hessels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

Review 3.  Representing serial action and perception.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Luis Jiménez; Willem B Verwey; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

4.  Physiological threat responses predict number processing.

Authors:  Annika Scholl; Korbinian Moeller; Daan Scheepers; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Kai Sassenberg
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-10-29

5.  Self-selected conscious strategies do not modulate motor cortical output during action observation.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The role of response mechanisms in determining reaction time performance: Piéron's law revisited.

Authors:  Tom Stafford; Kevin N Gurney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

7.  Integration of visual and tactile stimuli: top-down influences require time.

Authors:  David I Shore; Nevena Simic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control.

Authors:  Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Location-specific versus hemisphere-specific adaptation of processing selectivity.

Authors:  Mike Wendt; Rainer H Kluwe; Ina Vietze
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

10.  Callosal degradation in HIV-1 infection predicts hierarchical perception: a DTI study.

Authors:  Eva M Müller-Oehring; Tilman Schulte; Margaret J Rosenbloom; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Edith V Sullivan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.