Literature DB >> 28061943

The effects of awareness and secondary task demands on Stroop performance in the pre-cued lists paradigm.

Julie M Bugg1, Nathaniel T Diede2.   

Abstract

Prior research has demonstrated that explicit pre-cues informing participants of the proportion congruence of an upcoming list of Stroop trials affect performance in mostly congruent lists but not mostly incongruent lists. This pattern suggests a limited role for expectations in influencing Stroop performance. An alternative explanation, however, is that the effects of pre-cues may be masked by a bleed-over of awareness (of the proportion congruence manipulation) from cued to uncued lists given use of a within-subjects manipulation of cueing in prior research. One aim of the current study was to test this explanation by examining patterns of cueing effects when cueing is manipulated between subjects. A second aim was to examine the effects of a secondary, stimulus detection task on expectation and experience-driven effects in the pre-cued lists paradigm. Countering the bleed-over of awareness account, the prior finding of a selective effect of expectations in mostly congruent lists was again observed in the current experiments, and post-experimental assessments of awareness in the uncued condition were unrelated to Stroop performance. Additionally, it was demonstrated that the secondary task did not disrupt experience-driven control but did disrupt the expectation-driven use of pre-cues especially when participants did not know that secondary task stimuli would appear in advance of a list. These findings advance our understanding of the role of awareness in patterns of Stroop performance, and raise interesting questions about the types of advance knowledge that can be integrated in an expectation-driven fashion to optimize Stroop performance.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Awareness; Explicit versus implicit; Proportion congruence; Strategies; Stroop effect

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28061943      PMCID: PMC5496799          DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  37 in total

Review 1.  Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects.

Authors:  Robert D Melara; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Visual search, image organization, and reader error in roentgen diagnosis. Studies of the psycho-physiology of roentgen image perception.

Authors:  W J TUDDENHAM
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1962-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Larry L Jacoby; Swati Chanani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function.

Authors:  Amitai Shenhav; Matthew M Botvinick; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Hebbian learning of cognitive control: dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation.

Authors:  Tom Verguts; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Behavioral and neural evidence for item-specific performance monitoring.

Authors:  Chris Blais; Silvia Bunge
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Mark A McDaniel; Michael K Scullin; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Spontaneous decay of response-code activation.

Authors:  B Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994

9.  Posthypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference under cycloplegia.

Authors:  Amir Raz; Kim S Landzberg; Heather R Schweizer; Zohar R Zephrani; Theodore Shapiro; Jin Fan; Michael I Posner
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2003-09

10.  Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Larry L Jacoby; Jeffrey P Toth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  The flexibility of cognitive control: Age equivalence with experience guiding the way.

Authors:  Emily R Cohen-Shikora; Nathaniel T Diede; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-08-06

2.  Performance feedback promotes proactive but not reactive adaptation of conflict-control.

Authors:  Christina Bejjani; Sophie Tan; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.332

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.