Literature DB >> 12885110

Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects.

Robert D Melara1, Daniel Algom.   

Abstract

The goal of avoiding distraction (e.g., ignoring words when naming their print colors in a Stroop task) is opposed intrinsically by the penchant to process conspicuous and correlated characteristics of the environment (e.g., noticing trial-to-trial associations between the colors and the words). To reconcile these opposing forces, the authors propose a tectonic theory of selective attention in which 2 memory-based structures--dimensional imbalance and dimensional uncertainty--drive selection by processing salient, surprising, and/or correlated information contained within and across stimulus dimensions. Each structure modulates the buildup of excitation to targets and the buildup of inhibition to distractors and to memories of previous stimuli. Tectonic theory is implemented to simulate the impact of 4 types of context on the presence, magnitude, and direction of congruity effects and task effects in the Stroop paradigm. The tectonic model is shown to surpass other formal models in explaining the range and diversity of Sroop effects.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12885110     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  70 in total

1.  Proactive control of irrelevant task rules during cued task switching.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-28

2.  Depth cues do not underlie attentional modulations of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Martina Weltle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

3.  Size congruity effects with two-digit numbers: expanding the number line?

Authors:  Daniel Fitousi; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

4.  A reverse Stroop effect without translation or reading difficulty.

Authors:  Churs Blais; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

5.  Task set persistence modulates word reading following resolution of picture-word interference.

Authors:  Michael E J Masson; Daniel N Bub; Yoko Ishigami
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

6.  Psychological distance and reaction time in a Stroop task.

Authors:  Giorgio De Marchis; María del Prado Rivero Expósito; José Manuel Reales Avilés
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-06-01

7.  Long-term memory and the control of attentional control.

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr; David Kuhns; Jason Hubbard
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Exploring the temporal dynamics of social facilitation in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Dinkar Sharma; Rob Booth; Rupert Brown; Pascal Huguet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

9.  Best not to bet on the horserace: A comment on Forrin and MacLeod (2017) and a relevant stimulus-response compatibility view of colour-word contingency learning asymmetries.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

10.  Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a Stroop task.

Authors:  Yoav Bar-Anan; Nira Liberman; Yaacov Trope; Daniel Algom
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.