Literature DB >> 17441236

A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems.

P Monnin1, D Gutierrez, S Bulling, D Guntern, F R Verdun.   

Abstract

An objective analysis of image quality parameters was performed for six digital mammography systems. The presampled modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) for the systems were determined at different doses, for 28 kVp with a Mo/Mo or W/Al target/filter combination and 2 mm of additional aluminium filtration. The flat-panel units have higher MTF and DQE in the mid to high frequency range than standard CR systems. The highest DQE, over the whole dose range, is for the slit-scanning direct photon counting system. Dual-side read CR can overcome the inherent x-ray absorption and signal collection limitations of standard CR mammography, improving the low-frequency DQE by 40%, to the same level as full-field systems, but it does not improve the poor spatial resolution of phosphor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17441236     DOI: 10.1118/1.2432072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Effect of readout direction in the edge profile on the modulation transfer function of computed radiographic systems by use of the edge method.

Authors:  Nobukazu Tanaka; Junji Morishita; Norisato Tsuda; Masafumi Ohki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-06-04

2.  Mammographic density measurements are not affected by mammography system.

Authors:  Christine N Damases; Patrick C Brennan; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-03-04

3.  Effective DQE (eDQE) and speed of digital radiographic systems: an experimental methodology.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Alistair MacKenzie; Ian D Honey; James T Dobbins; Carl E Ravin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Musculoskeletal imaging with a prototype photon-counting detector.

Authors:  M Gruber; P Homolka; M Chmeissani; M Uffmann; M Pretterklieber; F Kainberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Physical image properties of a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor imager for mammography systems.

Authors:  Chizuru Okamoto; Yoshie Kodera
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-05-29

6.  Breast composition measurement with a cadmium-zinc-telluride based spectral computed tomography system.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Objective assessment of task performance: a comparison of two FFDM detectors using an anthropomorphic breast phantom.

Authors:  Andrey Makeev; Lynda C Ikejimba; Jesse Salad; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-10-17

8.  Detector or system? Extending the concept of detective quantum efficiency to characterize the performance of digital radiographic imaging systems.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Alistair MacKenzie; Ian D Honey; James T Dobbins; Carl E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  On the relevance of modulation transfer function measurements in digital mammography quality control.

Authors:  Kristina T Wigati; Nicholas W Marshall; Kim Lemmens; Joke Binst; Annelies Jacobs; Lesley Cockmartin; Guozhi Zhang; Liesbeth Vancoillie; Dimitar Petrov; Dirk A N Vandenbroucke; Djarwani S Soejoko; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-04-27

10.  Effect of beam quality and readout direction in the edge profile on the modulation transfer function of photostimulable phosphor systems via the edge method.

Authors:  Shinya Takarabe; Taku Kuramoto; Yusuke Shibayama; Hiroki Tsuru; Masato Tatsumi; Toyoyuki Kato; Kazutoshi Okamura; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.