Literature DB >> 33922996

Evaluation of Non-Uniform Image Quality Caused by Anode Heel Effect in Digital Radiography Using Mutual Information.

Ming-Chung Chou1,2,3.   

Abstract

Anode heel effects are known to cause non-uniform image quality, but no method has been proposed to evaluate the non-uniform image quality caused by the heel effect. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate non-uniform image quality in digital radiographs using a novel circular step-wedge (CSW) phantom and normalized mutual information (nMI). All X-ray images were acquired from a digital radiography system equipped with a CsI flat panel detector. A new acrylic CSW phantom was imaged ten times at various kVp and mAs to evaluate overall and non-uniform image quality with nMI metrics. For comparisons, a conventional contrast-detail resolution phantom was imaged ten times at identical exposure parameters to evaluate overall image quality with visible ratio (VR) metrics, and the phantom was placed in different orientations to assess non-uniform image quality. In addition, heel effect correction (HEC) was executed to elucidate the impact of its effect on image quality. The results showed that both nMI and VR metrics significantly changed with kVp and mAs, and had a significant positive correlation. The positive correlation is suggestive that the nMI metrics have a similar performance to the VR metrics in assessing the overall image quality of digital radiographs. The nMI metrics significantly changed with orientations and also significantly increased after HEC in the anode direction. However, the VR metrics did not change significantly with orientations or with HEC. The results indicate that the nMI metrics were more sensitive than the VR metrics with regards to non-uniform image quality caused by the anode heel effect. In conclusion, the proposed nMI metrics with a CSW phantom outperformed the conventional VR metrics in detecting non-uniform image quality caused by the heel effect, and thus are suitable for quantitatively evaluating non-uniform image quality in digital radiographs with and without HEC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anode heel effect; circular-step wedge; contrast-detail; mutual information; visible ratio

Year:  2021        PMID: 33922996     DOI: 10.3390/e23050525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Entropy (Basel)        ISSN: 1099-4300            Impact factor:   2.524


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  Patrik Sund; Magnus Båth; Susanne Kheddache; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Information entropy measure for evaluation of image quality.

Authors:  Du-Yih Tsai; Yongbum Lee; Eri Matsuyama
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Correlation of contrast-detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study.

Authors:  An De Crop; Klaus Bacher; Tom Van Hoof; Peter V Smeets; Barbara S Smet; Merel Vergauwen; Urszula Kiendys; Philippe Duyck; Koenraad Verstraete; Katharina D'Herde; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Optical factors affecting the detective quantum efficiency of radiographic screens.

Authors:  M Drangova; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a radiographic screen-film combination.

Authors:  P C Bunch; K E Huff; R Van Metter
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 3. Effect of pixel size on SNR and threshold contrast.

Authors:  M L Giger; K Doi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 6. MTFs of II-TV digital imaging systems.

Authors:  H Fujita; K Doi; M L Giger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Detector or system? Extending the concept of detective quantum efficiency to characterize the performance of digital radiographic imaging systems.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Alistair MacKenzie; Ian D Honey; James T Dobbins; Carl E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Comparison of computed radiography and film/screen combination using a contrast-detail phantom.

Authors:  Z F Lu; E L Nickoloff; J C So; A K Dutta
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Corruption of the Pearson correlation coefficient by measurement error and its estimation, bias, and correction under different error models.

Authors:  Edoardo Saccenti; Age K Smilde; Margriet H W B Hendriks
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Entropy in Image Analysis III.

Authors:  Amelia Carolina Sparavigna
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.524

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.