Literature DB >> 19002698

Prospective radiological study concerning a series of patients suffering from conductive or mixed hearing loss due to superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Christian Martin1, Pierre Chahine, Charles Veyret, Céline Richard, Jean Michel Prades, Jean François Pouget.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to appreciate the incidence of patients with isolated conductive hearing loss with normal drum due to superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD). It is a prospective radiological study. Two hundred and seventy-two patients with a normal drum suffering from isolated unilateral or bilateral conductive or mixed hearing loss were included in a prospective radiological study. A high resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) was performed in all the patients. Those who were found to have a unilateral or bilateral SCD underwent further etiological, clinical, audiologic evaluation. Ten patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss were found to have a unilateral or bilateral SCD. The disease was bilateral in five cases, and most often associated with a dehiscence of the tegmen tympani on both sides, supporting the theory of the congenital nature of the disease. There was no clear correlation between symptoms and the size of the SCD. Because patients were not suffering from incapacitating vestibular symptoms, they were not operated for surgical occlusion of the SCD, and were referred to a hearing aid specialist to improve hearing. Conductive or mixed hearing loss due to SCD is relatively frequent, justifying in our opinion that a systematic HRCT be carried out before surgery of any patient with conductive hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19002698     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0862-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  17 in total

1.  Bone conduction experiments in animals - evidence for a non-osseous mechanism.

Authors:  S Freeman; J Y Sichel; H Sohmer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Clinical manifestations of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Lloyd B Minor
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Bone conduction experiments in humans - a fluid pathway from bone to ear.

Authors:  H Sohmer; S Freeman; M Geal-Dor; C Adelman; I Savion
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Auditory function in patients with surgically treated superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Charles J Limb; John P Carey; Sharmila Srireddy; Lloyd B Minor
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 5.  [Otosclerosis imaging: matching clinical and imaging data].

Authors:  F Veillon; J L Stierle; J Dussaix; L Ramos-Taboada; S Riehm
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  2006-11

6.  Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  L B Minor; D Solomon; J S Zinreich; D S Zee
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-03

7.  Clinical, experimental, and theoretical investigations of the effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on hearing mechanisms.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Jocelyn E Songer; Hideko H Nakajima; Kelly M Brinsko; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  CT evaluation of bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal as a cause of sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo.

Authors:  Clifford J Belden; Noah Weg; Lloyd B Minor; S James Zinreich
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo.

Authors:  Anthony A Mikulec; Michael J McKenna; Mitchell J Ramsey; John J Rosowski; Barbara S Herrmann; Steven D Rauch; Hugh D Curtin; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Coronal computed tomography prevalence of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Robert A Williamson; Jeffrey T Vrabec; Newton J Coker; Marlin Sandlin
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.591

View more
  10 in total

1.  Acoustic effects of a superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a temporal bone study.

Authors:  J C Luers; D Pazen; H Meister; M Lauxmann; A Eiber; D Beutner; K B Hüttenbrink
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  [Acoustic and vestibular effects of superior semicircular canal dehiscence].

Authors:  J-C Luers; K-B Hüttenbrink
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence size and location on audiometric measurements, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials and video-head impulse testing.

Authors:  Andrea Castellucci; Gianluca Piras; Valeria Del Vecchio; Francesco Maria Crocetta; Vincenzo Maiolo; Gian Gaetano Ferri; Angelo Ghidini; Cristina Brandolini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Computerized Assessment of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Size using Advanced Morphological Imaging Operators.

Authors:  Joel S Beckett; Carlito Lagman; Lawrance K Chung; Timothy T Bui; Seung J Lee; Brittany L Voth; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Quinton Gopen; Isaac Yang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-12-07

5.  The effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on intracochlear sound pressures.

Authors:  Dominic V Pisano; Marlien E F Niesten; Saumil N Merchant; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Assessment of the effects of superior canal dehiscence location and size on intracochlear sound pressures.

Authors:  Marlien E F Niesten; Christof Stieger; Daniel J Lee; Julie P Merchant; Wilko Grolman; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Superior canal dehiscence length and location influences clinical presentation and audiometric and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential testing.

Authors:  Marlien E F Niesten; Leena M Hamberg; Joshua B Silverman; Kristina V Lou; Andrew A McCall; Alanna Windsor; Hugh D Curtin; Barbara S Herrmann; Wilko Grolman; Hideko H Nakajima; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Correlation of Superior Canal Dehiscence Surface Area With Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials, Audiometric Thresholds, and Dizziness Handicap.

Authors:  Jacob B Hunter; Brendan P O'Connell; Jianing Wang; Srijata Chakravorti; Katie Makowiec; Matthew L Carlson; Benoit Dawant; Devin L McCaslin; Jack H Noble; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Superior Canal Dehiscence: A Comparative Postmortem Multislice Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Philipp Mittmann; Arne Ernst; Rainer Seidl; Anna-Felicitas Skulj; Sven Mutze; Marc Windgassen; Claas Buschmann
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2018-08-01

10.  New classification of superior semicircular canal dehiscence in HRCT.

Authors:  Stephan Waldeck; Heinrich Lanfermann; Christian von Falck; Matthias F Froelich; René Chapot; Marc Brockmann; Daniel Overhoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.