Literature DB >> 15129113

Clinical, experimental, and theoretical investigations of the effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on hearing mechanisms.

John J Rosowski1, Jocelyn E Songer, Hideko H Nakajima, Kelly M Brinsko, Saumil N Merchant.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: A superior semicircular canal dehiscence affects hearing by introducing a third window into the inner ear that 1) lowers cochlear input impedance, 2) shunts air-conducted sound away from the cochlea resulting in conductive hearing loss, and 3) improves bone-conduction thresholds by increasing the difference in impedance between the vestibule and the round window.
BACKGROUND: Superior semicircular canal dehiscence has been linked to a "conductive" hearing loss characterized by a decrease in the sensitivity to air-conducted sound and hypersensitivity to bone-conducted sound.
METHODS: Four investigations were performed: 1) laser-Doppler vibrometer measurements of sound-induced umbo velocity in patients with computed tomographic scan-confirmed superior semicircular canal dehiscence; 2) laser-Doppler vibrometry of sound-induced motions of the vestibular lymph (either perilymph or endolymph) exposed in a chinchilla model of superior semicircular canal dehiscence; 3) studies in chinchillas of the effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on the cochlea's sensitivity to bone-conducted sounds; and 4) anatomically based theoretical analyses of sound flow through the human cochlea and semicircular canals.
RESULTS: The low-frequency umbo velocity in superior semicircular canal dehiscence patients without previous middle ear surgery ranged from normal through high normal. This tendency toward hypermobility suggests a decrease in cochlear impedance. Measurements of sound-induced velocity of the lymph within a superior semicircular canal dehiscence in chinchillas demonstrated sound flow through the dehiscence. Measurements of the cochlear potential demonstrated a superior semicircular canal dehiscence-induced increase in response to bone-conducted sound in eight of nine chinchillas. An anatomically based model of the human ear predicts changes in auditory sensitivity similar to audiometric changes in superior semicircular canal dehiscence.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that superior semicircular canal dehiscence can affect hearing function by introducing a third window into the inner ear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15129113     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200405000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  68 in total

1.  Superior canal dehiscence size: multivariate assessment of clinical impact.

Authors:  Wade W Chien; Kristen Janky; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Clinical Characteristics of Posterior and Lateral Semicircular Canal Dehiscence.

Authors:  Marko Spasic; Andy Trang; Lawrance K Chung; Nolan Ung; Kimberly Thill; Golmah Zarinkhou; Quinton S Gopen; Isaac Yang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-05-29

3.  Identifying Mechanisms Behind the Tullio Phenomenon: a Computational Study Based on First Principles.

Authors:  Bernhard J Grieser; Leonhard Kleiser; Dominik Obrist
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-16

4.  Effectiveness of Transmastoid Plugging for Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Stephen P Cass
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence on cochlear potential in response to air-conducted stimuli in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The effect of superior-canal opening on middle-ear input admittance and air-conducted stapes velocity in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Measurements of human middle- and inner-ear mechanics with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  Wade Chien; Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  A mechano-acoustic model of the effect of superior canal dehiscence on hearing in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Superior canal dehiscence length and location influences clinical presentation and audiometric and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential testing.

Authors:  Marlien E F Niesten; Leena M Hamberg; Joshua B Silverman; Kristina V Lou; Andrew A McCall; Alanna Windsor; Hugh D Curtin; Barbara S Herrmann; Wilko Grolman; Hideko H Nakajima; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Correlation of Superior Canal Dehiscence Surface Area With Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials, Audiometric Thresholds, and Dizziness Handicap.

Authors:  Jacob B Hunter; Brendan P O'Connell; Jianing Wang; Srijata Chakravorti; Katie Makowiec; Matthew L Carlson; Benoit Dawant; Devin L McCaslin; Jack H Noble; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.