Literature DB >> 10913886

Bone conduction experiments in humans - a fluid pathway from bone to ear.

H Sohmer1, S Freeman, M Geal-Dor, C Adelman, I Savion.   

Abstract

Animal experiments in this laboratory have led to the suggestion that a major pathway in bone conduction stimulation to the inner ear is via the skull contents (brain and CSF). This hypothesis was now tested in humans. Auditory nerve brainstem evoked responses could be recorded in neonates to bone conduction stimulation over the fontanelle and audiometric responses were obtained in neurosurgical patients with the bone vibrator on the skin over a craniotomy. There were no differences in threshold between these responses and those obtained to bone conduction stimulation over skull bone in the same subjects. Audiometric thresholds in response to bone vibrator stimulation of the eye (a 'natural craniotomy') were no different from those to bone stimulation delivered to several sites on the head. Thus there is no need to vibrate bone in order to obtain 'bone conduction' responses. Bone vibrator thresholds to stimulation at the head region with thinnest bone (temporal) were better than those to stimulation at the forehead region which has much thicker bone, implying that the vibrations penetrate the skull at the site of the vibrator. In addition, the magnitude of vibration (acceleration) measured at various sites around the head in response to bone vibrator stimulation at a fixed point on the forehead generally decreased with distance from the point of vibration. Therefore it seems that the vibrations produced by a bone vibrator at a point on the head are also able to penetrate the skull, setting up audio-frequency pressures in the CSF which spread by fluid communications to the inner ear fluids, exciting the ear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10913886     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00099-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  22 in total

1.  Interactions in the cochlea between air conduction and osseous and non-osseous bone conduction stimulation.

Authors:  Cahtia Adelman; Rachel Fraenkel; Leonid Kriksunov; Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Vergence increases the amplitude of lateral ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  László T Tamás; Americo A Migliaccio; Christopher J Todd; Michael C Schubert; Béla Büki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP) to skull taps in normal and dehiscent ears: mechanisms and markers of superior canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Rachael L Taylor; Catherine Blaivie; Andreas P Bom; Berit Holmeslet; Tony Pansell; Krister Brantberg; Miriam S Welgampola
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Air, bone and soft tissue excitation of the cochlea in the presence of severe impediments to ossicle and window mobility.

Authors:  Ronen Perez; Cahtia Adelman; Shai Chordekar; Reuven Ishai; Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Reflections on the role of a traveling wave along the basilar membrane in view of clinical and experimental findings.

Authors:  Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Comparison of umbo velocity in air- and bone-conduction.

Authors:  Christof Röösli; David Chhan; Christopher Halpin; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Incapacitating hypersensitivity to one's own body sounds due to a dehiscence of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal. A case report.

Authors:  Nicolas Schmuziger; John Allum; Carlos Buitrago-Téllez; Rudolf Probst
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  A superior semicircular canal dehiscence-induced air-bone gap in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Limits on normal cochlear 'third' windows provided by previous investigations of additional sound paths into and out of the cat inner ear.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Peter Bowers; Hideko H Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Prospective radiological study concerning a series of patients suffering from conductive or mixed hearing loss due to superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Christian Martin; Pierre Chahine; Charles Veyret; Céline Richard; Jean Michel Prades; Jean François Pouget
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.