Literature DB >> 19002366

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: reliability of anatomical landmarks and reference lines used to assess pelvic organ prolapse.

Suzan R Broekhuis1, Kirsten B Kluivers, Jan C M Hendriks, Mark E Vierhout, Jelle O Barentsz, Jurgen J Fütterer.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the intra- and interobserver reliability of dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) staging in pelvic organ prolapse patients. In 30 patients with pelvic organ prolapse, dynamic MR images were assessed independently by two observers. Various anatomical landmarks to asses pelvic organ prolapse were used in relation to the pubococcygeal line, H-line, and mid-pubic line. Clinical measurement points were assessed in relation to the mid-pubic line. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to describe the intra- and interobserver reliability. Overall, the intra- and interobserver reliability of MR imaging measurements was excellent to good. The pubococcygeal line showed superior reliability (ICC range 0.70-0.99). The reliability of clinical measurement points, however, were only moderate (ICC range 0.20-0.96). The intra- and interobserver reliability of quantitative prolapse staging on dynamic MR imaging were good to excellent. The pubococcygeal line appears the most reliable to use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19002366     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0760-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  27 in total

1.  Dynamic half Fourier acquisition, single shot turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the female pelvis.

Authors:  A E Gousse; Z L Barbaric; M H Safir; S Madjar; A K Marumoto; S Raz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Assessment of pelvic organ descent by use of functional cine-MRI: which reference line should be used?

Authors:  Andreas Lienemann; Dorothée Sprenger; Udo Janssen; Eva Grosch; Christoph Pellengahr; Christoph Anthuber
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  H K Pannu
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

4.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and cystocolpoproctography alter surgical management of pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  H S Kaufman; J L Buller; J R Thompson; H K Pannu; S L DeMeester; R R Genadry; D A Bluemke; B Jones; J L Rychcik; G W Cundiff
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  A prospective comparison between clinical outcome and open-configuration magnetic resonance defecography findings before and after surgery for symptomatic rectocele.

Authors:  M Hübner; F Hetzer; D Weishaupt; D Hahnloser; P-A Clavien; N Demartines
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 7.  Dynamic MR defecography of the posterior compartment: Indications, techniques and MRI features.

Authors:  Koenraad J Mortele; Janice Fairhurst
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Pelvic prolapse: assessment with evacuation proctography (defecography)

Authors:  F M Kelvin; D D Maglinte; J A Hornback; J T Benson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Perineal descent and levator ani hernia: a dynamic magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Susan L Gearhart; Harpreet K Pannu; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Jerome L Buller; David A Bluemke; Howard S Kaufman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor defects in women.

Authors:  Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-12
View more
  14 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of paravaginal defect repair with and without apical suspension: a 6-month postoperative follow-up with MRI, clinical examination, and questionnaires.

Authors:  Louise T S Arenholt; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen; Karin Glavind; Susanne Greisen; Karl M Bek; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  POP-Q, dynamic MR imaging, and perineal ultrasonography: do they agree in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse?

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Kirsten B Kluivers; Jan C M Hendriks; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz; Mark E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-02-17

3.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging before and 6 months after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Robin M F van der Weiden; Elena Rociu; Guido H H Mannaerts; Marcel H A van Hooff; Mark E Vierhout; Mariella I J Withagen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Pelvic floor dysfunctions: how to image patients?

Authors:  Francesca Iacobellis; Alfonso Reginelli; Daniela Berritto; Giuliano Gagliardi; Antonietta Laporta; Antonio Brillantino; Adolfo Renzi; Mariano Scaglione; Gabriele Masselli; Antonio Barile; Luigia Romano; Salvatore Cappabianca; Roberto Grassi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Relevance of open magnetic resonance imaging position (sitting and standing) to quantify pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Marwa Abdulaziz; Alex Kavanagh; Lynn Stothers; Andrew J Macnab
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Dynamic MR defecography with an open-configuration, low-field, tilting MR system in patients with pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  V Fiaschetti; E Squillaci; D Pastorelli; M Rascioni; V Funel; C Salimbeni; E Fanucci; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Variability in utilization and techniques of pelvic floor imaging: findings of the SAR pelvic floor dysfunction disease-focused panel.

Authors:  Milana Flusberg; Yin Xi; Kedar Jambhekar; Simin Bahrami; Victoria Chernyak; Neeraj Lalwani; Mark Lockhart; Roopa Ram; Julia R Fielding; Rania Farouk El Sayed; Gaurav Khatri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-02-13

8.  Clinical applications of pelvic floor imaging: opinion statement endorsed by the society of abdominal radiology (SAR), American Urological Association (AUA), and American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS).

Authors:  Victoria Chernyak; Joshua Bleier; Mariya Kobi; Ian Paquette; Milana Flusberg; Philippe Zimmern; Larissa V Rodriguez; Phyllis Glanc; Suzanne Palmer; Luz Maria Rodriguez; Marsha K Guess; Milena M Weinstein; Roopa Ram; Kedar Jambhekar; Gaurav Khatri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-27

9.  Symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction are poorly correlated with findings on clinical examination and dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor.

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jan C M Hendriks; Jelle O Barentsz; Mark E Vierhout; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-07-14

10.  Perineal descent and patients' symptoms of anorectal dysfunction, pelvic organ prolapse, and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Jan C M Hendriks; Jurgen J Fütterer; Mark E Vierhout; Jelle O Barentsz; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.