Literature DB >> 14694454

Assessment of pelvic organ descent by use of functional cine-MRI: which reference line should be used?

Andreas Lienemann1, Dorothée Sprenger, Udo Janssen, Eva Grosch, Christoph Pellengahr, Christoph Anthuber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: So far there is no agreement between clinical and radiological measurements and reference points for the quantification of pelvic organ descent in women. The aim of this study was to find out which of three reference lines on functional cine-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlates best with the respective clinical diagnoses.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the functional cine-MRI studies of 41 asymptomatic volunteers. Our golden standard was the results of the clinical examination using the International Continence Society (ICS)-score. On MRI, we measured the distance of the bladder-neck, distal edge of cervix/posterior fornix, and the most ventrocaudal point of the ventral rectal wall, respectively, to the pubococcygeal line (PCL), the horizontal tangent of the inferior rim of the pubic bone, and the line drawn through the long axis of the pubic bone. The results were correlated with the respective clinical findings using descriptive analysis alone.
RESULTS: The volunteers either showed a Stage 0 (16 cases), Stage I (12 cases), or a Stage II (13 cases) organ descent on clinical examination with 10 women (24.4%) having a pathological ICS-score in the anterior, 15 women (36.1%) in the superior, and 4 women (9.8%) in the posterior compartment. On functional MRI the best correlation with the clinical results was achieved using the PCL for the anterior compartment (22.0%), the PCL with an offset of +3 cm for the superior (36.6%), and the hymenal line (HL) for the posterior compartment (9.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Organ descent on functional cine-MRI cannot be described using only one reference line. In order to optimize clinical exploitation of functional MRI of the pelvic floor a consensus regarding imaging protocols and evaluation criteria should be aimed for. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14694454     DOI: 10.1002/nau.10170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  23 in total

1.  Interobserver agreement of multicompartment ultrasound in the assessment of pelvic floor anatomy.

Authors:  Farah Lone; Abdul H Sultan; Aleksandra Stankiewicz; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: comparing pubococcygeal and midpubic lines with clinical staging.

Authors:  Courtney A Woodfield; Brittany Star Hampton; Vivian Sung; Jeffrey M Brody
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-25

3.  Clinical-decision taking in primary pelvic organ prolapse; the effects of diagnostic tests on treatment selection in comparison with a consensus meeting.

Authors:  Annette G Groenendijk; Erwin Birnie; Sjoerd de Blok; Albert H Adriaanse; Willem M Ankum; Jan-Paul W Roovers; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-10

4.  POP-Q, dynamic MR imaging, and perineal ultrasonography: do they agree in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse?

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Kirsten B Kluivers; Jan C M Hendriks; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz; Mark E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-02-17

Review 5.  A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks.

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz; Mark E Vierhout; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-07

6.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: reliability of anatomical landmarks and reference lines used to assess pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Kirsten B Kluivers; Jan C M Hendriks; Mark E Vierhout; Jelle O Barentsz; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-11-11

7.  Is a wider angle of the membranous urethra associated with incontinence after radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Irina Soljanik; Ricarda M Bauer; Armin J Becker; Christian G Stief; Christian Gozzi; Olga Solyanik; Kerstin A Brocker; Sonja M Kirchhoff
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Comparison of measurement systems for posterior vaginal wall prolapse on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bing Xie; Luyun Chen; Zhuowei Xue; Emily M English; Dee E Fenner; Kara Gaetke-Udager; Giselle E Kolenic; James A Ashton-Miller; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Automated contour tracking and trajectory classification of pelvic organs on dynamic MRI.

Authors:  Iman Nekooeimehr; Susana Lai-Yuen; Paul Bao; Alfredo Weitzenfeld; Stuart Hart
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-03-30

10.  Perineal descent and patients' symptoms of anorectal dysfunction, pelvic organ prolapse, and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Jan C M Hendriks; Jurgen J Fütterer; Mark E Vierhout; Jelle O Barentsz; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.