Literature DB >> 33772614

Clinical applications of pelvic floor imaging: opinion statement endorsed by the society of abdominal radiology (SAR), American Urological Association (AUA), and American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS).

Victoria Chernyak1, Joshua Bleier2, Mariya Kobi3, Ian Paquette4, Milana Flusberg5, Philippe Zimmern6, Larissa V Rodriguez7, Phyllis Glanc8, Suzanne Palmer9, Luz Maria Rodriguez10, Marsha K Guess11, Milena M Weinstein12, Roopa Ram13, Kedar Jambhekar13, Gaurav Khatri14.   

Abstract

Pelvic floor dysfunction is prevalent, with multifactorial causes and variable clinical presentations. Accurate diagnosis and assessment of the involved structures commonly requires a multidisciplinary approach. Imaging is often complementary to clinical assessment, and the most commonly used modalities for pelvic floor imaging include fluoroscopic defecography, magnetic resonance defecography, and pelvic floor ultrasound. This collaboration opinion paper was developed by representatives from multiple specialties involved in care of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction (radiologists, urogynecologists, urologists, and colorectal surgeons). Here, we discuss the utility of imaging techniques in various clinical scenarios, highlighting the perspectives of referring physicians. The final draft was endorsed by the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR), American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS), and the American Urological Association (AUA).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33772614     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03017-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  83 in total

1.  Value of express T2-weighted pelvic MRI in the preoperative evaluation of severe pelvic floor prolapse: a prospective study.

Authors:  Robert R Kester; Line Leboeuf; Marco A Amendola; Sandy S Kim; Aldere Benoit; Angelo E Gousse
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  INTESTINAL EVACUATION STUDY: A NEW ROENTGENOLOGIC TECHNIQUE.

Authors:  H J BURHENNE
Journal:  Radiol Clin       Date:  1964

3.  Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography.

Authors:  F M Kelvin; D D Maglinte; D S Hale; J T Benson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Vaginal topography does not correlate well with visceral position in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  K Kenton; S Shott; L Brubaker
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1997

5.  Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging.

Authors:  D Vanbeckevoort; L Van Hoe; R Oyen; E Ponette; D De Ridder; J Deprest
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography: a diagnostic alternative in the assessment of pelvic floor disorders in proctology.

Authors:  M Rentsch; C Paetzel; M Lenhart; S Feuerbach; K W Jauch; A Fürst
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Harpreet K Pannu; Marcia C Javitt; Phyllis Glanc; Priyadarshani R Bhosale; Mukesh G Harisinghani; Nadia J Khati; Donald G Mitchell; David A Nyberg; Pari V Pandharipande; Thomas D Shipp; Cary Lynn Siegel; Lynn Simpson; Darci J Wall; Jade J Wong-You-Cheong
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Lifetime risk of surgical management for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence.

Authors:  M F Fialkow; K M Newton; G M Lentz; N S Weiss
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-09-26

10.  Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women.

Authors:  Ingrid Nygaard; Matthew D Barber; Kathryn L Burgio; Kimberly Kenton; Susan Meikle; Joseph Schaffer; Cathie Spino; William E Whitehead; Jennifer Wu; Debra J Brody
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  X-ray video defaecography is superior to magnetic resonance defaecography in the imaging of defaecation disorders.

Authors:  Eija Pääkkö; Johanna Mäkelä-Kaikkonen; Hannele Laukkanen; Pasi Ohtonen; Kirsi Laitakari; Tero Rautio; Heljä Oikarinen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.917

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.