Literature DB >> 17417089

Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor defects in women.

Katarzyna J Macura1.   

Abstract

Contemporary fast magnetic resonance imaging techniques allow dynamic evaluation of the entire female pelvic floor with excellent visualization of pelvic organs and muscular and fascial supportive structures in a single noninvasive study that does not expose the patient to ionizing radiation. This article focuses on the role of magnetic resonance imaging in defining pelvic floor defects that can guide surgical management of women with pelvic organ prolapse, especially those who undergo evaluation for symptoms of multicompartmental involvement before a complex pelvic floor reconstruction or those who have failed previous repairs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17417089     DOI: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e3180417dc8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0899-3459


  6 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of paravaginal defect repair with and without apical suspension: a 6-month postoperative follow-up with MRI, clinical examination, and questionnaires.

Authors:  Louise T S Arenholt; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen; Karin Glavind; Susanne Greisen; Karl M Bek; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: reliability of anatomical landmarks and reference lines used to assess pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Kirsten B Kluivers; Jan C M Hendriks; Mark E Vierhout; Jelle O Barentsz; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-11-11

3.  Comparing 3-Dimensional Ultrasound to 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Levator Ani Defects.

Authors:  Camille S Calderwood; Amy Thurmond; Amanda Holland; Blake Osmundsen; W Thomas Gregory
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

Review 4.  Paravaginal defect: anatomy, clinical findings, and imaging.

Authors:  Louise T S Arenholt; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen; Karin Glavind; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Relevance of open magnetic resonance imaging position (sitting and standing) to quantify pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Marwa Abdulaziz; Alex Kavanagh; Lynn Stothers; Andrew J Macnab
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Racial differences in pelvic anatomy by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Victoria L Handa; Mark E Lockhart; Julia R Fielding; Catherine S Bradley; Linda Brubaker; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Wen Ye; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.661

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.