Literature DB >> 19002282

Using answer-until-correct examinations to provide immediate feedback to students in a pharmacokinetics course.

Adam M Persky1, Gary M Pollack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To implement an answer-until-correct examination format for a pharmacokinetics course and determine whether this format assessed pharmacy students' mastery of the desired learning outcomes as well as a mixed format examination (eg, one with a combination of open-ended and fill-in-the-blank questions).
METHODS: Students in a core pharmacokinetics course were given 3 examinations in answer-until-correct format. The format allowed students multiple attempts at answering each question, with points allocated based on the number of attempts required to correctly answer the question. Examination scores were compared to those of students in the previous year as a control.
RESULTS: The grades of students who were given the immediate feedback examination format were equivalent to those of students in the previous year. The students preferred the testing format because it allowed multiple attempts to answer questions and provided immediate feedback. Some students reported increased anxiety because of the new examination format. DISCUSSION: The immediate feedback format assessed students' mastery of course outcomes, provided immediate feedback to encourage deep learning and critical-thinking skills, and was preferred by students over the traditional examination format.

Entities:  

Keywords:  answer-until-correct; anxiety; assessment; critical thinking; examination; pharmacokinetics; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19002282      PMCID: PMC2576422          DOI: 10.5688/aj720483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  10 in total

1.  Immediate feedback during academic testing.

Authors:  M L Epstein; B B Epstein; G M Brosvic
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2001-06

2.  Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique: multiple-choice test that "behaves" like an essay examination.

Authors:  Michael L Epstein; Gary M Brosvic
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2002-02

3.  The effect of item feedback on multiple-choice test responses.

Authors:  Ana R Delgado; Gerardo Prieto
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2003-02

4.  Students prefer the immediate feedback assessment technique.

Authors:  Michael L Epstein; Gary M Brosvic
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2002-06

5.  Test anxiety (worry and emotionality) changes during academic testing as a function of feedback and test importance.

Authors:  L W Morris; R S Fulmer
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  1976-12

6.  Formative assessment: a key to deep learning?

Authors:  Alison Rushton
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Multi-faceted approach to improve learning in pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Effects of orienting instructions, feedback-information, and trait-anxiety level on state-anxiety.

Authors:  S M Auerbach
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1973-12

9.  Test anxiety versus academic skills: a comparison of two alternative models for predicting performance in a statistics exam.

Authors:  J Musch; A Bröder
Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol       Date:  1999-03

10.  Feedback, test anxiety and performance in a college course.

Authors:  J W Clark; P A Fox; H G Schneider
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1998-02
  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  A process-oriented guided inquiry approach to teaching medicinal chemistry.

Authors:  Stacy D Brown
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Active-learning exercises to teach drug-receptor interactions in a medicinal chemistry course.

Authors:  Seetharama D Satyanarayanajois
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Best practices for implementing team-based learning in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Michelle Z Farland; Brigitte L Sicat; Andrea S Franks; Karen S Pater; Melissa S Medina; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Transforming a large-class lecture course to a smaller-group interactive course.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Gary M Pollack
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Comparison of answer-until-correct and full-credit assessments in a team-based learning course.

Authors:  Michelle Z Farland; Patrick B Barlow; T Levi Lancaster; Andrea S Franks
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  An eight-year retrospective study in "flipped" pharmacokinetics courses.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Robert E Dupuis
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Factors Affecting Student Time to Examination Completion.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Hannah Mierzwa
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Thinking Clinically from the Beginning: Early Introduction of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process.

Authors:  Anastasia Rivkin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 2.047

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.