Literature DB >> 16199357

Formative assessment: a key to deep learning?

Alison Rushton1.   

Abstract

A paradigm shift in assessment culture has emphasized the importance of formative assessment. The existing evidence supports the identification of feedback as the central component of formative assessment. Feedback provides information about the existing gap between the actual and desired levels of performance. The existing evidence suggests various characteristics of effective feedback, for example, ensuring that feedback is construct-referenced and student referenced. An exploration of the existing educational literature provides evidence for the emphasis on formative assessment. This paper evaluates the pedagogical implications of formative assessment to deep learning. A constructivist approach, emphasizing the principles of adult learning and placing emphasis on the student is advocated. However, in applying the wider educational literature to healthcare, it is questioned if the paradigm shift in assessment culture has occurred as the majority of the existing literature is centred on summative assessment.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16199357     DOI: 10.1080/01421590500129159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  28 in total

1.  Assessment of anatomical knowledge for clinical practice: perceptions of clinicians and students.

Authors:  Simon Rowland; Kamran Ahmed; David Ceri Davies; Hutan Ashrafian; Vishal Patel; Ara Darzi; Paraskevas A Paraskeva; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Using answer-until-correct examinations to provide immediate feedback to students in a pharmacokinetics course.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Gary M Pollack
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Motivating student learning using a formative assessment journey.

Authors:  Darrell J R Evans; Paul Zeun; Robert A Stanier
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Teaching ethics in neonatal and perinatal medicine: What is happening in Canada?

Authors:  Thierry Daboval; Gregory P Moore; Kristina Rohde; Katherine Moreau; Emanuela Ferretti
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Evaluation of feedback given to trainees in medical specialties.

Authors:  Tony Ck Tham; Bill Burr; Mairead Boohan
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.659

6.  Weaving together peer assessment, audios and medical vignettes in teaching medical terms.

Authors:  Mohammad Allibaih; Lateef M Khan
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2015-12-06

7.  Feedback Credibility in a Formative Postgraduate Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Effects of Examiner Type.

Authors:  Lynfa Stroud; Matthew Sibbald; Denyse Richardson; Heather McDonald-Blumer; Rodrigo B Cavalcanti
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-04

8.  Development of a Virtual Three-Dimensional Assessment Scenario for Anatomical Education.

Authors:  Katerina Bogomolova; Amir H Sam; Adam T Misky; Chinmay M Gupte; Paul H Strutton; Thomas J Hurkxkens; Beerend P Hierck
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Using Audience Response Technology to provide formative feedback on pharmacology performance for non-medical prescribing students--a preliminary evaluation.

Authors:  Alison Mostyn; Oonagh Meade; Joanne S Lymn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Students' and teachers' perceptions of clinical assessment program: A qualitative study in a PBL curriculum.

Authors:  Hanan Mf Al Kadri; Mohamed S Al-Moamary; Cees van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.