Literature DB >> 30323386

Factors Affecting Student Time to Examination Completion.

Adam M Persky1,2, Hannah Mierzwa1.   

Abstract

Objective. To investigate factors (prior or current knowledge, metacognitive accuracy, and personality) that might impact the time it takes students to complete an examination. Methods. On the final examination, the time to complete the examination was recorded. Prior to the course, students completed the five-factor personality assessment. During the semester, students completed four cumulative assessments that included prospective judgments of performance to improve their metacognitive accuracy. Measures of metacognitive accuracy were calculated from the difference between the students' prospective judgments of performance and their actual assessment performance for the final examination. Two weeks prior to the final examination, students completed a cumulative assessment, which served as prior knowledge; this was similar in content to the final examination. Results. The time to complete the final examination was significantly negatively correlated with examination score and positively correlated with Agreeableness, and degree of metacognitive bias. However, only current knowledge (β=-.35) and Agreeableness (β=.12) predicted the time to complete the final examination. These two factors explained about 14% of the variability in completion times. Examining the scale for the time to complete the examination, there were some regional differences between the slowest, intermediate and fastest completers. Conclusion. Current knowledge and to a lesser extent, pro-social behavior (agreeableness) influenced examination completion time. Metacognitive accuracy had limited predictability in time to complete the examination.

Keywords:  metacognition; personality; pharmacokinetics; time on task

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30323386      PMCID: PMC6181161          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  14 in total

1.  Does retrieval fluency contribute to the underconfidence-with-practice effect?

Authors:  Michael J Serra; John Dunlosky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.

Authors:  Arthur E Poropat
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Using answer-until-correct examinations to provide immediate feedback to students in a pharmacokinetics course.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Gary M Pollack
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Self-regulating the effortful "social dos".

Authors:  Kassandra Cortes; Lara K Kammrath; Abigail A Scholer; Johanna Peetz
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-12-30

5.  Unskilled and unaware in the classroom: College students' desired grades predict their biased grade predictions.

Authors:  Michael J Serra; Kenneth G DeMarree
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-10

6.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.

Authors:  R R McCrae; P T Costa
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-01

7.  Test difficulty and judgment bias.

Authors:  G Schraw; T D Roedel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-01

8.  Working memory capacity correlates with implicit serial reaction time task performance.

Authors:  J Bo; S Jennett; R D Seidler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.

Authors:  A S Benjamin; R A Bjork; B L Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-03

10.  Individual Differences in Metacognitive Responsiveness: Cognitive and Personality Correlates.

Authors:  David A Washburn; J David Smith; Lauren A Taglialatela
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2005-10
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Use of Personality Frameworks in Health Science Education.

Authors:  Lindsey Childs-Kean; Mary Edwards; Mary Douglass Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.047

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.