Literature DB >> 11508040

Immediate feedback during academic testing.

M L Epstein1, B B Epstein, G M Brosvic.   

Abstract

Performance on two multiple-choice testing procedures was examined during unit tests and a final examination. The Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique provided immediate response feedback in an answer-until-correct style of responding. The testing format which served as a point of comparison was the Scantron form. One format was completed by students in introductory psychology courses during unit tests whereas all students used the Scantron form on the final examination. Students tested with Immediate Feedback forms on the unit tests correctly answered more of the final examination questions which were repeated from earlier unit tests than did students tested with Scantron forms. Also, students tested with Immediate Feedback forms correctly answered more final examination questions previously answered incorrectly on the unit tests than did students tested previously with Scantron forms.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11508040     DOI: 10.2466/pr0.2001.88.3.889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rep        ISSN: 0033-2941


  8 in total

1.  The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Marsh; Henry L Roediger; Robert A Bjork; Elizabeth L Bjork
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

2.  Using answer-until-correct examinations to provide immediate feedback to students in a pharmacokinetics course.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Gary M Pollack
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Best practices for implementing team-based learning in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Michelle Z Farland; Brigitte L Sicat; Andrea S Franks; Karen S Pater; Melissa S Medina; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Comparison of answer-until-correct and full-credit assessments in a team-based learning course.

Authors:  Michelle Z Farland; Patrick B Barlow; T Levi Lancaster; Andrea S Franks
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  An fMRI study of error monitoring in Montessori and traditionally-schooled children.

Authors:  Mary Helen Immordino-Yang; David Sander; Solange Denervaud; Eleonora Fornari; Xiao-Fei Yang; Patric Hagmann
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2020-07-17

6.  Differences in Reaction to Immediate Feedback and Opportunity to Revise Answers for Multiple-Choice and Open-Ended Questions.

Authors:  Yigal Attali; Cara Laitusis; Elizabeth Stone
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.821

7.  Collaborative testing improves performance but not content retention in a large-enrollment introductory biology class.

Authors:  Hayley Leight; Cheston Saunders; Robin Calkins; Michelle Withers
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  An fMRI study of error monitoring in Montessori and traditionally-schooled children.

Authors:  Mary Helen Immordino-Yang; David Sander; Solange Denervaud; Eleonora Fornari; Xiao-Fei Yang; Patric Hagmann
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2020-07-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.