Literature DB >> 17339392

Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses.

Ralph W Preszler1, Angus Dawe, Charles B Shuster, Michèle Shuster.   

Abstract

With the advent of wireless technology, new tools are available that are intended to enhance students' learning and attitudes. To assess the effectiveness of wireless student response systems in the biology curriculum at New Mexico State University, a combined study of student attitudes and performance was undertaken. A survey of students in six biology courses showed that strong majorities of students had favorable overall impressions of the use of student response systems and also thought that the technology improved their interest in the course, attendance, and understanding of course content. Students in lower-division courses had more strongly positive overall impressions than did students in upper-division courses. To assess the effects of the response systems on student learning, the number of in-class questions was varied within each course throughout the semester. Students' performance was compared on exam questions derived from lectures with low, medium, or high numbers of in-class questions. Increased use of the response systems in lecture had a positive influence on students' performance on exam questions across all six biology courses. Students not only have favorable opinions about the use of student response systems, increased use of these systems increases student learning.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17339392      PMCID: PMC1854854          DOI: 10.1187/cbe.06-09-0190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ        ISSN: 1931-7913            Impact factor:   3.325


  6 in total

1.  Peer instruction improves performance on quizzes.

Authors:  S P Rao; S E DiCarlo
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Formative assessment in physiology teaching using a wireless classroom communication system.

Authors:  Cynthia B Paschal
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Introductory biology courses: a framework to support active learning in large enrollment introductory science courses.

Authors:  Ann C Smith; Richard Stewart; Patricia Shields; Jennifer Hayes-Klosteridis; Paulette Robinson; Robert Yuan
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

4.  Teaching more by lecturing less.

Authors:  Jennifer K Knight; William B Wood
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

5.  Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex.

Authors:  Deborah Allen; Kimberly Tanner
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

6.  Evaluating the impact of a classroom response system in a microbiology course.

Authors:  Erica Suchman; Kay Uchiyama; Ralph Smith; Kim Bender
Journal:  Microbiol Educ       Date:  2006-05
  6 in total
  27 in total

1.  Techniques and Technology to Revise Content Delivery and Model Critical Thinking in the Neuroscience Classroom.

Authors:  Kurt R Illig
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2015-07-07

2.  Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material.

Authors:  Kirsten Crossgrove; Kristen L Curran
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 3.  A primer on audience response systems: current applications and future considerations.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Evan Robinson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Replacing lecture with peer-led workshops improves student learning.

Authors:  Ralph W Preszler
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology.

Authors:  Peter Armbruster; Maya Patel; Erika Johnson; Martha Weiss
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Medical school hotline: harnessing technology for a 21st century medical education.

Authors:  Joseph W Turban
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2011-04

7.  A call for a community of practice to assess the impact of emerging technologies on undergraduate biology education.

Authors:  Jamie L Jensen; Juville Dario-Becker; Lee E Hughes; D Sue Katz Amburn; Joyce A Shaw
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2012-05-03

8.  Brief, cooperative peer-instruction sessions during lectures enhance student recall and comprehension.

Authors:  Niu Zhang; Charles N R Henderson
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2016-03-11

9.  Does displaying the class results affect student discussion during peer instruction?

Authors:  Kathryn E Perez; Eric A Strauss; Nicholas Downey; Anne Galbraith; Robert Jeanne; Scott Cooper
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  From Gatekeeping to Engagement: A Multicontextual, Mixed Method Study of Student Academic Engagement in Introductory STEM Courses.

Authors:  Josephine A Gasiewski; M Kevin Eagan; Gina A Garcia; Sylvia Hurtado; Mitchell J Chang
Journal:  Res High Educ       Date:  2012-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.