Literature DB >> 19000869

Ultrasonic viscoelasticity imaging of nonpalpable breast tumors: preliminary results.

Yupeng Qiu1, Mallika Sridhar, Jean K Tsou, Karen K Lindfors, Michael F Insana.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Improvements in the diagnosis of early breast cancers depend on a physician's ability to obtain the information necessary to distinguish nonpalpable malignant and benign tumors. Viscoelastic features that describe mechanical properties of tissues may help to distinguish these types of lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with nonpalpable, pathology-confirmed Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 4 or 5 breast lesions (10 benign, 11 malignant) detected by mammography were studied. Viscoelastic parameters were extracted from a time sequence of ultrasonic strain images, and differences in the parameters between malignant and benign tumors were compared. Parametric data were color coded and superimposed on sonograms.
RESULTS: The strain retardance time parameter, T(1), provided the best discrimination between malignant and benign tumors (P < .01). T(1) measures the time required for tissues to fully deform (strain) once compressed; therefore, it describes the time-varying viscous response of tissue to a small deforming force. Compared to the surrounding background tissues, malignant lesions have smaller average T(1) values, whereas benign lesions have higher T(1) values. This tissue-specific contrast correlates with known changes in the extracellular matrix of breast stroma.
CONCLUSION: Characterization of nonpalpable breast lesions is improved by the addition of viscoelastic strain imaging parameters. The differentiation of malignant and benign BI-RADS 4 or 5 tumors is especially evident with the use of the retardation time estimates, T(1).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19000869      PMCID: PMC2605073          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  15 in total

1.  Ultrasound elastography based on multiscale estimations of regularized displacement fields.

Authors:  Claire Pellot-Barakat; Frédérique Frouin; Michael F Insana; Alain Herment
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Optimizing multicompression approaches to elasticity imaging.

Authors:  Huini Du; Jie Liu; Claire Pellot-Barakat; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Ultrasonic measurements of breast viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Mallika Sridhar; Michael F Insana
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Ultrasound-stimulated vibro-acoustic spectrography.

Authors:  M Fatemi; J F Greenleaf
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Viscoelastic imaging of breast tumor microenvironment with ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael F Insana; Claire Pellot-Barakat; Mallika Sridhar; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.673

6.  Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography.

Authors:  Ralph Sinkus; Mickael Tanter; Tanja Xydeas; Stefan Catheline; Jeremy Bercoff; Mathias Fink
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Sulfated proteoglycans in the extracellular matrix of human breast tissues with infiltrating carcinoma.

Authors:  G A Losa; M Alini
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1993-06-19       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Concurrent and independent genetic alterations in the stromal and epithelial cells of mammary carcinoma: implications for tumorigenesis.

Authors:  F Moinfar; Y G Man; L Arnould; G L Bratthauer; M Ratschek; F A Tavassoli
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results.

Authors:  B S Garra; E I Cespedes; J Ophir; S R Spratt; R A Zuurbier; C M Magnant; M F Pennanen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis.

Authors:  Ako Itoh; Ei Ueno; Eriko Tohno; Hiroshi Kamma; Hideto Takahashi; Tsuyoshi Shiina; Makoto Yamakawa; Takeshi Matsumura
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  29 in total

1.  Role of sonoelastography in characterising breast nodules. Preliminary experience with 120 lesions.

Authors:  E Regini; S Bagnera; D Tota; P Campanino; A Luparia; F Barisone; M Durando; G Mariscotti; G Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Material properties from acoustic radiation force step response.

Authors:  Marko Orescanin; Kathleen S Toohey; Michael F Insana
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Elastography: general principles and clincial applications.

Authors:  M M Doyley; K J Parker
Journal:  Ultrasound Clin       Date:  2014-01

4.  Virtual Breast Quasi-static Elastography (VBQE).

Authors:  David Rosen; Yu Wang; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 1.578

5.  Loss tangent and complex modulus estimated by acoustic radiation force creep and shear wave dispersion.

Authors:  Carolina Amador; Matthew W Urban; Shigao Chen; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Acoustic Radiation Force-Induced Creep-Recovery (ARFICR): A Noninvasive Method to Characterize Tissue Viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Carolina Amador Carrascal; Shigao Chen; Matthew W Urban; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  pH-induced contrast in viscoelasticity imaging of biopolymers.

Authors:  R D Yapp; M F Insana
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Modeling Uncertainty of Strain Ratio Measurements in Ultrasound Breast Strain Elastography: A Factorial Experiment.

Authors:  David Rosen; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Building a virtual simulation platform for quasistatic breast ultrasound elastography using open source software: A preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Emily Helminen; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Fractional derivative models for ultrasonic characterization of polymer and breast tissue viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Cecile Coussot; Sureshkumar Kalyanam; Rebecca Yapp; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.