Literature DB >> 16471435

Optimizing multicompression approaches to elasticity imaging.

Huini Du1, Jie Liu, Claire Pellot-Barakat, Michael F Insana.   

Abstract

Breast lesion visibility in static strain imaging ultimately is noise limited. When correlation and related techniques are applied to estimate local displacements between two echo frames recorded before and after a small deformation, target contrast increases linearly with the amount of deformation applied. However, above some deformation threshold, decorrelation noise increases more than contrast such that lesion visibility is severely reduced. Multicompression methods avoid this problem by accumulating displacements from many small deformations to provide the same net increase in lesion contrast as one large deformation but with minimal decorrelation noise. Unfortunately, multicompression approaches accumulate echo noise (electronic and sampling) with each deformation step as contrast builds so that lesion visibility can be reduced again if the applied deformation increment is too small. This paper uses signal models and analysis techniques to develop multicompression strategies that minimize strain image noise. The analysis predicts that displacement variance is minimal in elastically homogeneous media when the applied strain increment is 0.0035. Predictions are verified experimentally with gelatin phantoms. For in vivo breast imaging, a strain increment as low as 0.0015 is recommended for minimum noise because of the greater elastic heterogeneity of breast tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16471435      PMCID: PMC2736134          DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2006.1588394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  9 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive measurement of mechanical properties of arteries in health and disease.

Authors:  A P Hoeks; P J Brands; J M Willigers; R S Reneman
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Maximum-likelihood approach to strain imaging using ultrasound

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression.

Authors:  T A Krouskop; T M Wheeler; F Kallel; B S Garra; T Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.578

4.  Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility.

Authors:  Kathryn Nightingale; Mary Scott Soo; Roger Nightingale; Gregg Trahey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Linear system models for ultrasonic imaging: application to signal statistics.

Authors:  Roger J Zemp; Craig K Abbey; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  The combined effect of signal decorrelation and random noise on the variance of time delay estimation.

Authors:  I Cespedes; J Ophir; S K Alam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  2-D companding for noise reduction in strain imaging.

Authors:  P Chaturvedi; M F Insana; T J Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Performance optimization in elastography: multicompression with temporal stretching.

Authors:  T Varghese; J Ophir
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.578

9.  Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results.

Authors:  B S Garra; E I Cespedes; J Ophir; S R Spratt; R A Zuurbier; C M Magnant; M F Pennanen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.105

  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks simulating malignant and benign breast lesions imaged with ultrasound.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Roger J Zemp; Jie Liu; Karen K Lindfors; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Ultrasonic measurements of breast viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Mallika Sridhar; Michael F Insana
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Two-dimensional simulations of displacement accumulation incorporating shear strain.

Authors:  Matthew Bayer; Timothy J Hall; Lucio P Neves; A A O Carneiro
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.578

4.  Complex principal components for robust motion estimation.

Authors:  F William Mauldin; Francesco Viola; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 5.  Medical ultrasound: imaging of soft tissue strain and elasticity.

Authors:  Peter N T Wells; Hai-Dong Liang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Viscoelastic imaging of breast tumor microenvironment with ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael F Insana; Claire Pellot-Barakat; Mallika Sridhar; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.673

7.  A GPU-Accelerated 3-D Coupled Subsample Estimation Algorithm for Volumetric Breast Strain Elastography.

Authors:  Bo Peng; Yuqi Wang; Timothy J Hall; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Variance and covariance of accumulated displacement estimates.

Authors:  Matthew Bayer; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.578

9.  Large-Strain 3-D in Vivo Breast Ultrasound Strain Elastography Using a Multi-compression Strategy and a Whole-Breast Scanning System.

Authors:  Yuqi Wang; Matthew Bayer; Jingfeng Jiang; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  A coupled subsample displacement estimation method for ultrasound-based strain elastography.

Authors:  Jingfeng Jiang; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.