Literature DB >> 22345425

Loss tangent and complex modulus estimated by acoustic radiation force creep and shear wave dispersion.

Carolina Amador1, Matthew W Urban, Shigao Chen, James F Greenleaf.   

Abstract

Elasticity imaging methods have been used to study tissue mechanical properties and have demonstrated that tissue elasticity changes with disease state. In current shear wave elasticity imaging methods typically only shear wave speed is measured and rheological models, e.g. Kelvin-Voigt, Maxwell and Standard Linear Solid, are used to solve for tissue mechanical properties such as the shear viscoelastic complex modulus. This paper presents a method to quantify viscoelastic material properties in a model-independent way by estimating the complex shear elastic modulus over a wide frequency range using time-dependent creep response induced by acoustic radiation force. This radiation force induced creep method uses a conversion formula that is the analytic solution of a constitutive equation. The proposed method in combination with shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry is used to measure the complex modulus so that knowledge of the applied radiation force magnitude is not necessary. The conversion formula is shown to be sensitive to sampling frequency and the first reliable measure in time according to numerical simulations using the Kelvin-Voigt model creep strain and compliance. Representative model-free shear complex moduli from homogeneous tissue mimicking phantoms and one excised swine kidney were obtained. This work proposes a novel model-free ultrasound-based elasticity method that does not require a rheological model with associated fitting requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22345425      PMCID: PMC3376913          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/5/1263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  30 in total

1.  Shear wave elasticity imaging: a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics.

Authors:  A P Sarvazyan; O V Rudenko; S D Swanson; J B Fowlkes; S Y Emelianov
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; S K Alam; B Garra; F Kallel; E Konofagou; T Krouskop; T Varghese
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  A method of imaging viscoelastic parameters with acoustic radiation force.

Authors:  W F Walker; F J Fernandez; L A Negron
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  On the feasibility of remote palpation using acoustic radiation force.

Authors:  K R Nightingale; M L Palmeri; R W Nightingale; G E Trahey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Measuring of viscoelastic properties of homogeneous soft solid using transient elastography: an inverse problem approach.

Authors:  S Catheline; J L Gennisson; G Delon; M Fink; R Sinkus; S Abouelkaram; J Culioli
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography.

Authors:  Gabriel Montaldo; Mickaël Tanter; Jérémy Bercoff; Nicolas Benech; Mathias Fink
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Noninvasive evaluation of renal allograft fibrosis by transient elastography--a pilot study.

Authors:  Robert Arndt; Sven Schmidt; Christoph Loddenkemper; Maria Grünbaum; Walter Zidek; Markus van der Giet; Timm H Westhoff
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.782

8.  Shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) on swine kidney.

Authors:  Carolina Amador; Matthew W Urban; Shigao Chen; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  MR elastography of liver fibrosis: preliminary results comparing spin-echo and echo-planar imaging.

Authors:  Laurent Huwart; Najat Salameh; Leon ter Beek; Eric Vicaut; Frank Peeters; Ralph Sinkus; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Ultrasonic viscoelasticity imaging of nonpalpable breast tumors: preliminary results.

Authors:  Yupeng Qiu; Mallika Sridhar; Jean K Tsou; Karen K Lindfors; Michael F Insana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic radiation force elasticity imaging in diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  Joshua R Doherty; Gregg E Trahey; Kathryn R Nightingale; Mark L Palmeri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Acoustic Radiation Force-Induced Creep-Recovery (ARFICR): A Noninvasive Method to Characterize Tissue Viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Carolina Amador Carrascal; Shigao Chen; Matthew W Urban; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Single tracking location acoustic radiation force impulse viscoelasticity estimation (STL-VE): A method for measuring tissue viscoelastic parameters.

Authors:  Jonathan H Langdon; Etana Elegbe; Stephen A McAleavey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 4.  Production of acoustic radiation force using ultrasound: methods and applications.

Authors:  Matthew W Urban
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.166

5.  Measurement of viscoelastic properties of in vivo swine myocardium using lamb wave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (LDUV).

Authors:  Matthew W Urban; Cristina Pislaru; Ivan Z Nenadic; Randall R Kinnick; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Viscoelastic biomarker for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesion in ultra- low frequency range.

Authors:  Alireza Nabavizadeh; Mahdi Bayat; Viksit Kumar; Adriana Gregory; Jeremy Webb; Azra Alizad; Mostafa Fatemi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Viscoelastic Response Ultrasound Derived Relative Elasticity and Relative Viscosity Reflect True Elasticity and Viscosity: In Silico and Experimental Demonstration.

Authors:  Md Murad Hossain; Caterina M Gallippi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  On the Quantitative Potential of Viscoelastic Response (VisR) Ultrasound Using the One-Dimensional Mass-Spring-Damper Model.

Authors:  Mallory R Selzo; Christopher J Moore; Md Murad Hossain; Mark L Palmeri; Caterina M Gallippi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Effects of Loading and Boundary Conditions on the Performance of Ultrasound Compressional Viscoelastography: A Computational Simulation Study to Guide Experimental Design.

Authors:  Che-Yu Lin; Ke-Vin Chang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.