Literature DB >> 26328994

Building a virtual simulation platform for quasistatic breast ultrasound elastography using open source software: A preliminary investigation.

Yu Wang1, Emily Helminen1, Jingfeng Jiang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Quasistatic ultrasound elastography (QUE) is being used to augment in vivo characterization of breast lesions. Results from early clinical trials indicated that there was a lack of confidence in image interpretation. Such confidence can only be gained through rigorous imaging tests using complex, heterogeneous but known media. The objective of this study is to build a virtual breast QUE simulation platform in the public domain that can be used not only for innovative QUE research but also for rigorous imaging tests.
METHODS: The main thrust of this work is to streamline biomedical ultrasound simulations by leveraging existing open source software packages including Field II (ultrasound simulator), VTK (geometrical visualization and processing), FEBio [finite element (FE) analysis], and Tetgen (mesh generator). However, integration of these open source packages is nontrivial and requires interdisciplinary knowledge. In the first step, a virtual breast model containing complex anatomical geometries was created through a novel combination of image-based landmark structures and randomly distributed (small) structures. Image-based landmark structures were based on data from the NIH Visible Human Project. Subsequently, an unstructured FE-mesh was created by Tetgen. In the second step, randomly positioned point scatterers were placed within the meshed breast model through an octree-based algorithm to make a virtual breast ultrasound phantom. In the third step, an ultrasound simulator (Field II) was used to interrogate the virtual breast phantom to obtain simulated ultrasound echo data. Of note, tissue deformation generated using a FE-simulator (FEBio) was the basis of deforming the original virtual breast phantom in order to obtain the postdeformation breast phantom for subsequent ultrasound simulations. Using the procedures described above, a full cycle of QUE simulations involving complex and highly heterogeneous virtual breast phantoms can be accomplished for the first time.
RESULTS: Representative examples were used to demonstrate capabilities of this virtual simulation platform. In the first set of three ultrasound simulation examples, three heterogeneous volumes of interest were selected from a virtual breast ultrasound phantom to perform sophisticated ultrasound simulations. These resultant B-mode images realistically represented the underlying complex but known media. In the second set of three QUE examples, advanced applications in QUE were simulated. The first QUE example was to show breast tumors with complex shapes and/or compositions. The resultant strain images showed complex patterns that were normally seen in freehand clinical ultrasound data. The second and third QUE examples demonstrated (deformation-dependent) nonlinear strain imaging and time-dependent strain imaging, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed virtual QUE platform was implemented and successfully tested in this study. Through show-case examples, the proposed work has demonstrated its capabilities of creating sophisticated QUE data in a way that cannot be done through the manufacture of physical tissue-mimicking phantoms and other software. This open software architecture will soon be made available in the public domain and can be readily adapted to meet specific needs of different research groups to drive innovations in QUE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26328994      PMCID: PMC4545098          DOI: 10.1118/1.4928707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  36 in total

1.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Gina K Hesley; Gale A Sisney; William E Svensson; Jason P Fine; Jinfeng Jiang; Nicholas J Hangiandreou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Spectral ratio method to estimate broadband ultrasound attenuation of cortical bones in vitro using multiple reflections.

Authors:  Rui Zheng; Lawrence H Le; Mauricio D Sacchi; Dean Ta; Edmond Lou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A framework for geometric analysis of vascular structures: application to cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  Marina Piccinelli; Alessandro Veneziani; David A Steinman; Andrea Remuzzi; Luca Antiga
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Linear and nonlinear elasticity imaging of soft tissue in vivo: demonstration of feasibility.

Authors:  Assad A Oberai; Nachiket H Gokhale; Sevan Goenezen; Paul E Barbone; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Anthropomorphic phantoms for assessment of strain imaging methods involving saline-infused sonohysterography.

Authors:  Maritza A Hobson; Ernest L Madsen; Gary R Frank; Jingfeng Jiang; Hairong Shi; Timothy J Hall; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  A generalized speckle tracking algorithm for ultrasonic strain imaging using dynamic programming.

Authors:  Jingfeng Jiang; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 8.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  S J Lord; W Lei; P Craft; J N Cawson; I Morris; S Walleser; A Griffiths; S Parker; N Houssami
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Ultrasonic viscoelasticity imaging of nonpalpable breast tumors: preliminary results.

Authors:  Yupeng Qiu; Mallika Sridhar; Jean K Tsou; Karen K Lindfors; Michael F Insana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Amanda M Adams; Roberta A Jong; Richard G Barr; Daniel E Lehrer; Etta D Pisano; W Phil Evans; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Glenna J Gabrielli; Ellen B Mendelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  11 in total

1.  Antibody with Infinite Affinity for In Vivo Tracking of Genetically Engineered Lymphocytes.

Authors:  Simone Krebs; Afruja Ahad; Lukas M Carter; Justin Eyquem; Christian Brand; Meghan Bell; Vladimir Ponomarev; Thomas Reiner; Claude F Meares; Stephen Gottschalk; Michel Sadelain; Steven M Larson; Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Building an open-source simulation platform of acoustic radiation force-based breast elastography.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Bo Peng; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  An analysis of intrinsic variations of low-frequency shear wave speed in a stochastic tissue model: the first application for staging liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Min Wang; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Virtual Breast Quasi-static Elastography (VBQE).

Authors:  David Rosen; Yu Wang; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 1.578

5.  4D cardiac electromechanical activation imaging.

Authors:  Julien Grondin; Dafang Wang; Christopher S Grubb; Natalia Trayanova; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.589

6.  An Improved Region-Growing Motion Tracking Method Using More Prior Information for 3-D Ultrasound Elastography.

Authors:  Yuqi Wang; Matthew Bayer; Jingfeng Jiang; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Neural-network-based Motion Tracking for Breast Ultrasound Strain Elastography: An Initial Assessment of Performance and Feasibility.

Authors:  Bo Peng; Yuhong Xian; Quan Zhang; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  Characterizing Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues Using Non-contact Displacement Measurements: How Should We Assess the Uncertainty?

Authors:  Ami Kling; Sean J Kirkpatrick; Jingfen Jiang
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2021-03-05

9.  Modeling Uncertainty of Strain Ratio Measurements in Ultrasound Breast Strain Elastography: A Factorial Experiment.

Authors:  David Rosen; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  A Normalized Shear Deformation Indicator for Ultrasound Strain Elastography in Breast Tissues: An In Vivo Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Jingfeng Jiang; Bo Peng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.