Literature DB >> 15838608

Viscoelastic imaging of breast tumor microenvironment with ultrasound.

Michael F Insana1, Claire Pellot-Barakat, Mallika Sridhar, Karen K Lindfors.   

Abstract

Imaging systems are most effective for detection and classification when they exploit contrast mechanisms specific to particular disease processes. A common example is mammography, where the contrast depends on local changes in cell density and the presence of microcalcifications. Unfortunately the specificity for classifying malignant breast disease is relatively low for many current diagnostic techniques. This paper describes a new ultrasonic technique for imaging the viscoelastic properties of breast tissue. The mechanical properties of glandular breast tissue, like most biopolymers, react to mechanical stimuli in a manner specific to the microenvironment of the tissue. Elastic properties allow noninvasive imaging of desmoplasia while viscous properties describe metabolism-dependent features such as pH. These ultrasonic methods are providing new tools for studying disease mechanisms as well as improving diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15838608      PMCID: PMC2715558          DOI: 10.1007/s10911-004-1409-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia        ISSN: 1083-3021            Impact factor:   2.673


  47 in total

Review 1.  Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues.

Authors:  James F Greenleaf; Mostafa Fatemi; Michael Insana
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Feature-adaptive motion tracking of ultrasound image sequences using a deformable mesh.

Authors:  F Yeung; S F Levinson; D Fu; K J Parker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Testing the limitations of 2-D companding for strain imaging using phantoms.

Authors:  P Chaturvedi; M F Insana; T J Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Motions and relaxations of confined liquids.

Authors:  S Granick
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-09-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Detection of tumor angiogenesis in vivo by alphaVbeta3-targeted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D A Sipkins; D A Cheresh; M R Kazemi; L M Nevin; M D Bednarski; K C Li
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 6.  Challenges and opportunities for in vivo imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2002-12

Review 7.  Measuring hypoxia and predicting tumor radioresistance with nuclear medicine assays.

Authors:  J D Chapman; E L Engelhardt; C C Stobbe; R F Schneider; G E Hanks
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  In vivo positron-emission tomography imaging of progression and transformation in a mouse model of mammary neoplasia.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Alexander D Borowsky; Erik T McGoldrick; Jeffrey P Gregg; Jeannie E Maglione; Robert D Cardiff; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The influence of pH on the survival after X-irradiation of cultured malignant cells. Effects of carbonylcyanide-3-chlorophenylhydrazone.

Authors:  J Haveman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1980-02

10.  Contributions of cell metabolism and H+ diffusion to the acidic pH of tumors.

Authors:  Paul A Schornack; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

View more
  32 in total

1.  Harmonic Motion Imaging (HMI) for Tumor Imaging and Treatment Monitoring.

Authors:  Elisa E Konofagou; Caroline Maleke; Jonathan Vappou
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2012

2.  Lymph node biophysical remodeling is associated with melanoma lymphatic drainage.

Authors:  Nathan Andrew Rohner; Jacob McClain; Sara Lydia Tuell; Alex Warner; Blair Smith; Youngho Yun; Abhinav Mohan; Manuela Sushnitha; Susan Napier Thomas
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Sonoelastography findings for idiopathic granulomatous mastitis.

Authors:  Afak Durur-Karakaya; Irmak Durur-Subasi; Mufide Nuran Akcay; Sare Sipal; Bülent Guvendi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Real-time quasi-static ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Graham Treece; Joel Lindop; Lujie Chen; James Housden; Richard Prager; Andrew Gee
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Breast elastography: A literature review.

Authors:  A Goddi; M Bonardi; S Alessi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2012-06-30

Review 6.  Implications of Lymphatic Transport to Lymph Nodes in Immunity and Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Susan N Thomas; Nathan A Rohner; Erin E Edwards
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 9.590

7.  Virtual Breast Quasi-static Elastography (VBQE).

Authors:  David Rosen; Yu Wang; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  Elasticity imaging of polymeric media.

Authors:  Mallika Sridhar; Jie Liu; Michael F Insana
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Dynamic functional and mechanical response of breast tissue to compression.

Authors:  S A Carp; J Selb; Q Fang; R Moore; D B Kopans; E Rafferty; D A Boas
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Nonpalpable breast masses: evaluation by US elastography.

Authors:  Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon; Jeong Seon Park; Joo Hee Cha; Mijung Jang; Min Hyun Seong
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.