Literature DB >> 19000210

Two fixations suffice in face recognition.

Janet Hui-wen Hsiao1, Garrison Cottrell.   

Abstract

It is well known that there exist preferred landing positions for eye fixations in visual word recognition. However, the existence of preferred landing positions in face recognition is less well established. It is also unknown how many fixations are required to recognize a face. To investigate these questions, we recorded eye movements during face recognition. During an otherwise standard face-recognition task, subjects were allowed a variable number of fixations before the stimulus was masked. We found that optimal recognition performance is achieved with two fixations; performance does not improve with additional fixations. The distribution of the first fixation is just to the left of the center of the nose, and that of the second fixation is around the center of the nose. Thus, these appear to be the preferred landing positions for face recognition. Furthermore, the fixations made during face learning differ in location from those made during face recognition and are also more variable in duration; this suggests that different strategies are used for face learning and face recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19000210     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02191.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  80 in total

1.  Attentional capture and hold: the oculomotor correlates of the change detection advantage for faces.

Authors:  Matthew D Weaver; Johan Lauwereyns
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-05-11

2.  Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures.

Authors:  Charles C-F Or; Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Natural, but not artificial, facial movements elicit the left visual field bias in infant face scanning.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Andrea Wheeler; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Gaze patterns during identity and emotion judgments in hearing adults and deaf users of American Sign Language.

Authors:  Susan M Letourneau; Teresa V Mitchell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Design of a gaze-sensitive virtual social interactive system for children with autism.

Authors:  Uttama Lahiri; Zachary Warren; Nilanjan Sarkar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  The left-side bias is not unique to own-race face processing.

Authors:  Chenglin Li; Zhiguo Wang; Hui Bao; Jianping Wang; Shuang Chen; Xiaohua Cao
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The categories, frequencies, and stability of idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns to faces.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Exploring eye movements in patients with glaucoma when viewing a driving scene.

Authors:  David P Crabb; Nicholas D Smith; Franziska G Rauscher; Catharine M Chisholm; John L Barbur; David F Edgar; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Learning optimal eye movements to unusual faces.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.