Literature DB >> 25064049

Natural, but not artificial, facial movements elicit the left visual field bias in infant face scanning.

Naiqi G Xiao1, Paul C Quinn2, Andrea Wheeler3, Olivier Pascalis4, Kang Lee5.   

Abstract

A left visual field (LVF) bias has been consistently reported in eye movement patterns when adults look at face stimuli, which reflects hemispheric lateralization of face processing and eye movements. However, the emergence of the LVF attentional bias in infancy is less clear. The present study investigated the emergence and development of the LVF attentional bias in infants from 3 to 9 months of age with moving face stimuli. We specifically examined the naturalness of facial movements in infants'LVF attentional bias by comparing eye movement patterns in naturally and artificially moving faces. Results showed that 3- to 5-month-olds exhibited the LVF attentional bias only in the lower half of naturally moving faces, but not in artificially moving faces. Six- to 9-month-olds showed the LVF attentional bias in both the lower and upper face halves only in naturally moving, but not in artificially moving faces. These results suggest that the LVF attentional bias for face processing may emerge around 3 months of age and is driven by natural facial movements. The LVF attentional bias reflects the role of natural face experience in real life situations that may drive the development of hemispheric lateralization of face processing in infancy.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developmental change; Eye movements; Face processing; Infants; Left visual field bias; Natural facial movements

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25064049      PMCID: PMC4167482          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  53 in total

1.  Functional asymmetry in the face.

Authors:  B D Chaurasia; H K Goswami
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1975

2.  Perceptual biases in chimeric face processing: eye-movement patterns cannot explain it all.

Authors:  Stephen H Butler; Monika Harvey
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Asymmetry in face processing during childhood measured with chimeric faces.

Authors:  Abeer Aljuhanay; Elizabeth Milne; D Michael Burt; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2009-03-16

4.  Topography of visual cortex connections with frontal eye field in macaque: convergence and segregation of processing streams.

Authors:  J D Schall; A Morel; D J King; J Bullier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Developing a side bias for conspecific faces during childhood.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Margaret C Moulson
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-09

6.  Gaze motor asymmetries in the perception of faces during a memory task.

Authors:  I Mertens; H Siegmund; O J Grüsser
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Similarity and difference in the processing of same- and other-race faces as revealed by eye tracking in 4- to 9-month-olds.

Authors:  Shaoying Liu; Paul C Quinn; Andrea Wheeler; Naiqi Xiao; Liezhong Ge; Kang Lee
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2010-08-13

8.  Left visual field biases when infants process faces: a comparison of infants at high- and low-risk for autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Eva Dundas; Holly Gastgeb; Mark S Strauss
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-12

9.  Evidence of a shift from featural to configural face processing in infancy.

Authors:  Gudrun Schwarzer; Nicola Zauner; Bianca Jovanovic
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2007-07

10.  Laterality effect for faces in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Christoph D Dahl; Malte J Rasch; Masaki Tomonaga; Ikuma Adachi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Habit2: A stand-alone software solution for presenting stimuli and recording infant looking times in order to study infant development.

Authors:  Lisa M Oakes; Daniel Sperka; Michaela C DeBolt; Lisa M Cantrell
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-10

2.  Eye tracking reveals a crucial role for facial motion in recognition of faces by infants.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Shaoying Liu; Liezhong Ge; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2015-06

3.  Infants' anticipatory eye movements: feature-based attention guides infants' visual attention.

Authors:  Shuma Tsurumi; So Kanazawa; Masami K Yamaguchi; Jun-Ichiro Kawahara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Visuospatial Bias in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Evidence from Line Bisection Tasks.

Authors:  Chunyan Liu; Huajie Zhai; Shuhua Su; Sutao Song; Gongxiang Chen; Yi Jiang
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-11-16

5.  Characterization of performance on an automated visual recognition memory task in 7.5-month-old infants.

Authors:  Kelsey L C Dzwilewski; Francheska M Merced-Nieves; Andrea Aguiar; Susan A Korrick; Susan L Schantz
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 3.763

6.  Facial perception of infants with cleft lip and palate with/without the NAM appliance.

Authors:  A Quast; J Waschkau; J Saptschak; N Daratsianos; K Jordan; P Fromberger; J L Müller; P Meyer-Marcotty
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Gaze behaviour to lateral face stimuli in infants who do and do not gain an ASD diagnosis.

Authors:  Georgina Donati; Rachael Davis; Gillian S Forrester
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.