Literature DB >> 21882720

Gaze patterns during identity and emotion judgments in hearing adults and deaf users of American Sign Language.

Susan M Letourneau1, Teresa V Mitchell.   

Abstract

Deaf individuals rely on facial expressions for emotional, social, and linguistic cues. In order to test the hypothesis that specialized experience with faces can alter typically observed gaze patterns, twelve hearing adults and twelve deaf, early-users of American Sign Language judged the emotion and identity of expressive faces (including whole faces, and isolated top and bottom halves), while accuracy and fixations were recorded. Both groups recognized individuals more accurately from top than bottom halves, and emotional expressions from bottom than top halves. Hearing adults directed the majority of fixations to the top halves of faces in both tasks, but fixated the bottom half slightly more often when judging emotion than identity. In contrast, deaf adults often split fixations evenly between the top and bottom halves regardless of task demands. These results suggest that deaf adults have habitual fixation patterns that may maximize their ability to gather information from expressive faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21882720      PMCID: PMC3454476          DOI: 10.1068/p6858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  37 in total

1.  Face, eye and object early processing: what is the face specificity?

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Marianne Latinus; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Perception of sign language and its application to visual communications for deaf people.

Authors:  Laura J Muir; Iain E G Richardson
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2005-07-06

3.  Eye fixations of deaf and hearing observers in simultaneous communication perception.

Authors:  Carol Lee De Filippo; Charissa R Lansing
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations.

Authors:  Jason J S Barton; Nathan Radcliffe; Mariya V Cherkasova; Jay Edelman; James M Intriligator
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Early face processing specificity: it's in the eyes!

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Claude Alain; Katherine Sedore; Anthony R McIntosh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Gaze behavior in analytical and holistic face processing.

Authors:  Gudrun Schwarzer; Susanne Huber; Thomas Dümmler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03

7.  Putting culture under the 'spotlight' reveals universal information use for face recognition.

Authors:  Roberto Caldara; Xinyue Zhou; Sébastien Miellet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Two fixations suffice in face recognition.

Authors:  Janet Hui-wen Hsiao; Garrison Cottrell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-10

9.  Eye gaze during observation of static faces in deaf people.

Authors:  Katsumi Watanabe; Tetsuya Matsuda; Tomoyuki Nishioka; Miki Namatame
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Culture shapes how we look at faces.

Authors:  Caroline Blais; Rachael E Jack; Christoph Scheepers; Daniel Fiset; Roberto Caldara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

1.  Behavioral and neural evidence of increased attention to the bottom half of the face in deaf signers.

Authors:  Teresa V Mitchell; Susan M Letourneau; Melissa C T Maslin
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  ENHANCED PERIPHERAL FACE PROCESSING IN DEAF INDIVIDUALS.

Authors:  Kassandra R Lee; Elizabeth Groesbeck; O Scott Gwinn; Michael A Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  J Percept Imaging       Date:  2021-05-04

3.  How sign language expertise can influence the effects of face masks on non-linguistic characteristics.

Authors:  Wee Kiat Lau; Jana Chalupny; Klaudia Grote; Anke Huckauf
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-06-23

4.  Response bias reveals enhanced attention to inferior visual field in signers of American Sign Language.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Jenessa L Seymour; Peter C Hauser
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The signing body: extensive sign language practice shapes the size of hands and face.

Authors:  Laura Mora; Anna Sedda; Teresa Esteban; Gianna Cocchini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Hearing Status Affects Children's Emotion Understanding in Dynamic Social Situations: An Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Yung-Ting Tsou; Boya Li; Mariska E Kret; Johan H M Frijns; Carolien Rieffe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Early deafness increases the face inversion effect but does not modulate the composite face effect.

Authors:  Adélaïde de Heering; Abeer Aljuhanay; Bruno Rossion; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-25

8.  Visual field bias in hearing and deaf adults during judgments of facial expression and identity.

Authors:  Susan M Letourneau; Teresa V Mitchell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-06

9.  PERVALE-S: a new cognitive task to assess deaf people's ability to perceive basic and social emotions.

Authors:  José M Mestre; Cristina Larrán; Joaquín Herrero; Rocío Guil; Gabriel G de la Torre
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-07

10.  Compensatory changes in cortical resource allocation in adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Julia Campbell; Anu Sharma
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.