Literature DB >> 18990739

Too many referrals of low-risk women for BRCA1/2 genetic services by family physicians.

Della Brown White1, Vence L Bonham, Jean Jenkins, Nancy Stevens, Colleen M McBride.   

Abstract

The increasing availability and public awareness of BRCA1/2 genetic testing will increase women's self-referrals to genetic services. The objective of this study was to examine whether patient characteristics influence the referral decisions of family physicians when a patient requests BRCA1/2 genetic testing. Family physicians (n = 284) completed a Web-based survey in 2006 to assess their attitudes and practices related to the use of genetics in their clinical practice. Using a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design, we tested the effects of a hypothetical patient's race, level of worry, and insurance status on the decisions of family physicians to refer her for BRCA1/2 testing. The patient was not appropriate for referral based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. No patient characteristics were associated with the family physicians' referral decisions. Although referral was not indicated, only 8% did not refer to genetic services; 92% referred for genetic services, and 50% referred to genetic counseling. Family physicians regarded it unlikely that the patient carried a mutation, but 65% of family physicians believed that if they refused to refer for genetic services it would harm their relationship with the patient. Despite scarce and costly genetic services, family physicians were likely to inappropriately refer a low-risk patient who requested BRCA1/2 testing. The implications of this inappropriate referral on women's screening behavior, genetic services, and health care costs are unknown. Clinicians and patients could benefit from education about the appropriate use of genetic services so that both are more comfortable with a decision against referral.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18990739      PMCID: PMC2772063          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  35 in total

1.  GPs' views on their role in cancer genetics services and current practice.

Authors:  A Fry; H Campbell; H Gudmunsdottir; R Rush; M Porteous; D Gorman; A Cull
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 2.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Physician use of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Louise Wideroff; Andrew N Freedman; Lorayn Olson; Carrie N Klabunde; William Davis; Kadaba P Srinath; Robert T Croyle; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Why do physicians vary so widely in their referral rates?

Authors:  P Franks; G C Williams; J Zwanziger; C Mooney; M Sorbero
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Alabama's primary care physicians regarding cancer genetics.

Authors:  R T Acton; N M Burst; L Casebeer; S M Ferguson; P Greene; B L Laird; L Leviton
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Use of cancer susceptibility testing among primary care physicians.

Authors:  R Sifri; R Myers; T Hyslop; B Turner; J Cocroft; T Rothermel; J Grana; N Schlackman
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Direct observation of requests for clinical services in office practice: what do patients want and do they get it?

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz; Robert A Bell; Rahman Azari; Steven Kelly-Reif; Edward Krupat; David H Thom
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-07-28

8.  Increasing the accuracy of perceived breast cancer risk: results from a randomized trial with Cancer Information Service callers.

Authors:  Sharon Davis; Susan Stewart; Joan Bloom
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Direct-to-consumer advertising: physicians' views of its effects on quality of care and the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  Elizabeth Murray; Bernard Lo; Lance Pollack; Karen Donelan; Ken Lee
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

10.  Referrals of women with a family history of breast cancer from primary care to cancer genetics services in South East Scotland.

Authors:  H Campbell; S Holloway; R Cetnarskyj; E Anderson; R Rush; A Fry; D Gorman; M Steel; M Porteous
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  20 in total

1.  A theory-informed systematic review of clinicians' genetic testing practices.

Authors:  Jean L Paul; Hanna Leslie; Alison H Trainer; Clara Gaff
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Personal genomic information management and personalized medicine: challenges, current solutions, and roles of HIM professionals.

Authors:  Amal Alzu'bi; Leming Zhou; Valerie Watzlaf
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2014-04-01

3.  BRCA testing in unaffected young women in the United States, 2006-2017.

Authors:  Fangjian Guo; Matthew Scholl; Erika L Fuchs; Abbey B Berenson; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Use of BRCA Mutation Test in the U.S., 2004-2014.

Authors:  Fangjian Guo; Jacqueline M Hirth; Yu-Li Lin; Gwyn Richardson; Lyuba Levine; Abbey B Berenson; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Skin cancer concerns and genetic risk information-seeking in primary care.

Authors:  J Hay; K A Kaphingst; R Baser; Y Li; S Hensley-Alford; C M McBride
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Breast cancer genetic counselling referrals: how comparable are the findings between the UK and the Netherlands?

Authors:  Akke Albada; Julie Werrett; Sandra Van Dulmen; Jozien M Bensing; Cyril Chapman; Margreet G E M Ausems; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-08-18

7.  Cancer genetic risk assessment and referral patterns in primary care.

Authors:  Hetal S Vig; Joanne Armstrong; Brian L Egleston; Carla Mazar; Michele Toscano; Angela R Bradbury; Mary B Daly; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2009-12

8.  The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes.

Authors:  Nabil Amara; Jolyane Blouin-Bougie; Jalila Jbilou; Norrin Halilem; Jacques Simard; Réjean Landry
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 9.  Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Beth A Tarini; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.929

10.  Primary care providers' willingness to recommend BRCA1/2 testing to adolescents.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Beth N Peshkin; George Luta; Anisha Abraham; Leslie R Walker; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.