BACKGROUND: Genomic testing for common genetic variants associated with skin cancer risk could enable personalized risk feedback to motivate skin cancer screening and sun protection. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we investigated whether skin cancer cognitions and behavioral factors, sociodemographics, family factors, and health information-seeking were related to perceived importance of learning about how (a) genes and (b) health habits affect personal health risks using classification and regression trees (CART). RESULTS: The sample (n = 1,772) was collected in a large health maintenance organization as part of the Multiplex Initiative, ranged in age from 25-40, was 53% female, 41% Caucasian, and 59% African-American. Most reported that they placed somewhat to very high importance on learning about how genes (79%) and health habits (88%) affect their health risks. Social influence actors were associated with information-seeking about genes and health habits. Awareness of family history was associated with importance of health habit, but not genetic, information-seeking. CONCLUSIONS: The investment of family and friends in health promotion may be a primary motivator for prioritizing information-seeking about how genes and health habits affect personal health risks and may contribute to the personal value, or personal utility, of risk information. Individuals who seek such risk information may be receptive to interventions aimed to maximize the social implications of healthy lifestyle change to reduce their health risks.
BACKGROUND: Genomic testing for common genetic variants associated with skin cancer risk could enable personalized risk feedback to motivate skin cancer screening and sun protection. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we investigated whether skin cancer cognitions and behavioral factors, sociodemographics, family factors, and health information-seeking were related to perceived importance of learning about how (a) genes and (b) health habits affect personal health risks using classification and regression trees (CART). RESULTS: The sample (n = 1,772) was collected in a large health maintenance organization as part of the Multiplex Initiative, ranged in age from 25-40, was 53% female, 41% Caucasian, and 59% African-American. Most reported that they placed somewhat to very high importance on learning about how genes (79%) and health habits (88%) affect their health risks. Social influence actors were associated with information-seeking about genes and health habits. Awareness of family history was associated with importance of health habit, but not genetic, information-seeking. CONCLUSIONS: The investment of family and friends in health promotion may be a primary motivator for prioritizing information-seeking about how genes and health habits affect personal health risks and may contribute to the personal value, or personal utility, of risk information. Individuals who seek such risk information may be receptive to interventions aimed to maximize the social implications of healthy lifestyle change to reduce their health risks.
Authors: Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody Journal: Public Health Genomics Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Stephenie C Lemon; Jane Zapka; Wenjun Li; Barbara Estabrook; Milagros Rosal; Robert Magner; Victoria Andersen; Amy Borg; Janet Hale Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Eleni Linos; Susan M Swetter; Myles G Cockburn; Graham A Colditz; Christina A Clarke Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2009-01-08 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody Journal: Genet Med Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Smita C Banerjee; Andrew Sussman; Elizabeth Schofield; Dolores D Guest; Yvonne S Dailey; Matthew R Schwartz; David B Buller; Keith Hunley; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Marianne Berwick; Jennifer L Hay Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2021-10-06
Authors: Ashley Elrick; Sato Ashida; Jennifer Ivanovich; Sarah Lyons; Barbara B Biesecker; Melody S Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2016-07-16 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Nicci Bartley; Christine E Napier; Zoe Butt; Timothy E Schlub; Megan C Best; Barbara B Biesecker; Mandy L Ballinger; Phyllis Butow Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-04-22
Authors: Jennifer L Hay; Marianne Berwick; Kate Zielaskowski; Kirsten Am White; Vivian M Rodríguez; Erika Robers; Dolores D Guest; Andrew Sussman; Yvonne Talamantes; Matthew R Schwartz; Jennie Greb; Jessica Bigney; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Keith Hunley; David B Buller Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2017-04-25
Authors: Grace Davies; Phyllis Butow; Christine E Napier; Nicci Bartley; Ilona Juraskova; Bettina Meiser; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Timothy E Schlub; Megan C Best Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Adrianne R Mallen; Claire C Conley; Lindsay Fuzzell; Dana Ketcher; Bianca M Augusto; McKenzie McIntyre; Laura V Barton; Mary K Townsend; Brooke L Fridley; Shelley S Tworoger; Robert M Wenham; Susan T Vadaparampil Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 3.603