Literature DB >> 10533942

GPs' views on their role in cancer genetics services and current practice.

A Fry1, H Campbell, H Gudmunsdottir, R Rush, M Porteous, D Gorman, A Cull.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing demand for cancer genetics services has necessitated an urgent review of how these services are organized and, in particular, identification of an effective role for primary care.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the views of GPs on their role in cancer genetics services and their confidence in performing that role; to assess their understanding of cancer genetics, current practice and referral behaviour; and to identify needs for information and training to enable GPs to play an effective role in these services.
METHOD: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey of GPs was conducted through general practices in SE Scotland; 397 (response rate 59.3%) GPs returned a completed questionnaire. Outcome measures were: responders' perceptions of their role in cancer genetics services; confidence within that role; understanding of cancer genetics; current practice regarding patients presenting with concerns about their family history of cancer; and perceived information and training needs.
RESULTS: GPs identified their role to be: taking a family history; making appropriate referrals to specialist services; providing emotional support; teaching breast self-examination; and discussing need for screening. Lack of confidence within this role was reflected in low levels of understanding of cancer genetics and in inappropriate referral practices. Concerns were expressed about the increasingly specialist role demanded of primary care. A desire for referral guidelines and community genetics clinics was identified.
CONCLUSIONS: GPs readily identify a role for themselves in cancer genetics services, but admit to a lack of confidence in this area, calling for clear referral guidelines and specialist community support. Current inappropriate referral to specialist services results from a lack of confidence in estimating cancer risk, highlighting the need for the development of clear referral criteria. Given the rapidly increasing demand for cancer genetics services and the vital role of primary care, it is important to identify a model of these services that facilitates effective involvement of GPs without further increasing their workload.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10533942     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/16.5.468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  48 in total

1.  Evaluation of the impact of two educational interventions on GP management of familial breast/ovarian cancer cases: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  E Watson; A Clements; P Yudkin; P Rose; C Bukach; J Mackay; A Lucassen; J Austoker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Genetic cancer risk assessment in general practice: systematic review of tools available, clinician attitudes, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Flore Laforest; Pia Kirkegaard; Baljinder Mann; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Reconsidering the family history in primary care.

Authors:  Eugene C Rich; Wylie Burke; Caryl J Heaton; Susanne Haga; Linda Pinsky; M Priscilla Short; Louise Acheson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Family history in primary care: understanding GPs' resistance to clinical genetics--qualitative study.

Authors:  Jonathan Mathers; Sheila Greenfield; Alison Metcalfe; Trevor Cole; Sarah Flanagan; Sue Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Genetic Testing and Genetic Counselors in Jordan: A Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Mamoun Ahram; Majd Soubani; Lana Abu Salem; Haneen Saker; Muayyad Ahmad
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  The use of a family history risk assessment tool within a community health care system: views of primary care providers.

Authors:  Carol A Christianson; Karen Potter Powell; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Susan H Blanton; Jessica Bogacik; Vincent C Henrich
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Genetics education for health professionals: a context.

Authors:  Joseph D McInerney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Jon Emery; Dejana Braithwaite; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Development and validation of a primary care-based family health history and decision support program (MeTree).

Authors:  Lori A Orlando; Adam H Buchanan; Susan E Hahn; Carol A Christianson; Karen P Powell; Celette Sugg Skinner; Blair Chesnut; Colette Blach; Barbara Due; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Vincent C Henrich
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug

10.  Too many referrals of low-risk women for BRCA1/2 genetic services by family physicians.

Authors:  Della Brown White; Vence L Bonham; Jean Jenkins; Nancy Stevens; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.