Literature DB >> 12692103

Physician use of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: results of a national survey.

Louise Wideroff1, Andrew N Freedman, Lorayn Olson, Carrie N Klabunde, William Davis, Kadaba P Srinath, Robert T Croyle, Rachel Ballard-Barbash.   

Abstract

Genetic testing for inherited germ-line mutations associated with cancer susceptibility is an emerging technology in medical practice. Limited information is currently available about physician use of cancer susceptibility tests (CSTs). In 1999-2000, a nationally representative survey was conducted to estimate prevalence of CST use by United States physicians and assess demographic, training, practice setting, and practice patterns associated with use. A stratified random sample of clinicians in eight specialties was selected from a file of all licensed physicians. In total, 1251 physicians, including 820 in primary care and 431 in tertiary care, responded to a 15-min questionnaire by mail, telephone, fax, or Internet (response rate = 71.0%). In the previous 12 months, 31.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 28.5-33.9] overall, including 30.6% (95% CI, 27.5-33.7) in primary care and 33.4% (95% CI, 27.9-38.9) in tertiary care, had ordered CSTs or referred patients elsewhere for risk assessment or testing. More physicians referred patients elsewhere [26.7% (95% CI, 24.2-29.2)] than directly ordered tests [7.9% (95% CI, 6.3-9.5)]. Factors associated with ordering or referring included practice location in the Northeast [odds ratio (OR), 2.30; 95% CI, 1.46-3.63%], feeling qualified to recommend CSTs (OR, 1.96; 95% CI = 1.41-2.72), receiving CST advertising materials (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.40-2.78%), and most notably, having patients who asked whether they can or should get tested (OR, 5.52; 95% CI, 3.97-7.67%). Lower CST use was associated with not knowing if there were local testing and counseling facilities (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23-0.66%). These findings underscore the importance of establishing effective clinical approaches to test use and promoting physician education to facilitate communication with patients about cancer genetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12692103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  49 in total

1.  Development of a brochure for increasing awareness of inherited breast cancer in black women.

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Anxhela Gjyshi; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

3.  The PING personally controlled electronic medical record system: technical architecture.

Authors:  William W Simons; Kenneth D Mandl; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Increasing utilization of cancer genetic counseling services using a patient navigator model.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Anna Sukhanova; Jennifer Ellis; Judy Mouchawar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Integrating next-generation sequencing into pediatric oncology practice: An assessment of physician confidence and understanding of clinical genomics.

Authors:  Liza-Marie Johnson; Jessica M Valdez; Emily A Quinn; April D Sykes; Rose B McGee; Regina Nuccio; Stacy J Hines-Dowell; Justin N Baker; Chimene Kesserwan; Kim E Nichols; Belinda N Mandrell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Barriers to and motivations for physician referral of patients to cancer genetics clinics.

Authors:  Carrie F Prochniak; Lisa J Martin; Erin M Miller; Sara C Knapke
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  A theory-informed systematic review of clinicians' genetic testing practices.

Authors:  Jean L Paul; Hanna Leslie; Alison H Trainer; Clara Gaff
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Cancer genetic risk assessment and referral patterns in primary care.

Authors:  Hetal S Vig; Joanne Armstrong; Brian L Egleston; Carla Mazar; Michele Toscano; Angela R Bradbury; Mary B Daly; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2009-12

9.  Too many referrals of low-risk women for BRCA1/2 genetic services by family physicians.

Authors:  Della Brown White; Vence L Bonham; Jean Jenkins; Nancy Stevens; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Next-generation sequencing in the clinic: are we ready?

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker; Wylie Burke; Isaac Kohane; Sharon E Plon; Ron Zimmern
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.