Literature DB >> 20001580

Cancer genetic risk assessment and referral patterns in primary care.

Hetal S Vig1, Joanne Armstrong, Brian L Egleston, Carla Mazar, Michele Toscano, Angela R Bradbury, Mary B Daly, Neal J Meropol.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to describe cancer risk assessment practices among primary care providers (PCPs).
METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to PCPs affiliated with a single insurance carrier. Demographic and practice characteristics associated with cancer genetic risk assessment and testing activities were described. Latent class analysis supported by likelihood ratio tests was used to define PCP profiles with respect to the level of engagement in genetic risk assessment and referral activity based on demographic and practice characteristics.
RESULTS: 860 physicians responded to the survey (39% family practice, 29% internal medicine, 22% obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN), 10% other). Most respondents (83%) reported that they routinely assess hereditary cancer risk; however, only 33% reported that they take a full, three-generation pedigree for risk assessment. OB/GYN specialty, female gender, and physician access to a genetic counselor were independent predictors of referral to cancer genetics specialists. Three profiles of PCPs, based upon referral practice and extent of involvement in genetics evaluation, were defined.
CONCLUSION: Profiles of physician characteristics associated with varying levels of engagement with cancer genetic risk assessment and testing can be identified. These profiles may ultimately be useful in targeting decision support tools and services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20001580      PMCID: PMC2935840          DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2009.0037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers        ISSN: 1945-0257


  32 in total

Review 1.  Current and future applications of genetics in primary care medicine.

Authors:  Louise S Acheson; Georgia L Wiesner
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.907

2.  A latent class analysis of underage problem drinking: evidence from a community sample of 16-20 year olds.

Authors:  Beth A Reboussin; Eun-Young Song; Anshu Shrestha; Kurt K Lohman; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Integrating genetic counseling into family medicine.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Martin; Adam S Wilikofsky
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 3.292

4.  Are college student smokers really a homogeneous group? a latent class analysis of college student smokers.

Authors:  Erin L Sutfin; Beth A Reboussin; Thomas P McCoy; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Empowering primary care health professionals in medical genetics: how soon? How fast? How far?

Authors:  K Greendale; R E Pyeritz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

6.  Development and validation of a cluster-based classification system to facilitate treatment tailoring.

Authors:  Susan E Collins; Iris Torchalla; Martina Schröter; Gerhard Buchkremer; Anil Batra
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 7.  Cancer genetics in primary care.

Authors:  Kent D McKelvey; James P Evans
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Genetics in primary care: a USA faculty development initiative.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Louise Acheson; Jeffery Botkin; Kenneth Bridges; Ardis Davis; James Evans; Jaime Frias; James Hanson; Norman Kahn; Ruth Kahn; David Lanier; Linda E Pinsky; Nancy Press; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Eugene Rich; Nancy Stevens; Elizabeth Thomson; Steven Wartman; Modena Wilson
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2002

9.  ACMG statement on direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Differential use of available genetic tests among primary care physicians in the United States: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Alexandra E Shields; Wylie Burke; Douglas E Levy
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  30 in total

1.  Factors which impact the delivery of genetic risk assessment services focused on inherited cancer genomics: expanding the role and reach of certified genetics professionals.

Authors:  Cristi Radford; Anya Prince; Karen Lewis; Tuya Pal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Examination of the Patient-Focused Impact of Cancer Telegenetics Among a Rural Population: Comparison with Traditional In-Person Services.

Authors:  Nan M Solomons; Amanda E Lamb; Frances L Lucas; Eileen F McDonald; Susan Miesfeldt
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.536

3.  Promoting guideline-based cancer genetic risk assessment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in ethnically and geographically diverse cancer survivors: Rationale and design of a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Rachel Howell; Rachel Ruckman; Jean A McDougall; Tawny W Boyce; Belinda Vicuña; Ji-Hyun Lee; Dolores D Guest; Randi Rycroft; Patricia A Valverde; Kristina M Gallegos; Angela Meisner; Charles L Wiggins; Antoinette Stroup; Lisa E Paddock; Scott T Walters
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Acceptability of telemedicine and other cancer genetic counseling models of service delivery in geographically remote settings.

Authors:  Eileen McDonald; Amanda Lamb; Barbara Grillo; Lee Lucas; Susan Miesfeldt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Recognizing BRCA gene mutation risk subsequent to breast cancer diagnosis in southwestern Ontario.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Winsion Chow; Laura Lester; Peter Ainsworth; Jeff Nisker; Muriel Brackstone
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Physician Risk Assessment Knowledge Regarding BRCA Genetics Testing.

Authors:  Jason Cohn; William Blazey; David Tegay; Brian Harper; Sharon Koehler; Brookshield Laurent; Vivian Chan; Min-Kyung Jung; Bhuma Krishnamachari
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Laurie E Steffen; Barbara H Brumbach; Wendy Kohlmann; Ruofei Du; Ji-Hyun Lee; Amanda Gammon; Karin Butler; Saundra S Buys; Antoinette M Stroup; Rebecca A Campo; Kristina G Flores; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Genetic risk assessments in individuals at high risk for inherited breast cancer in the breast oncology care setting.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.302

9.  Evolution of Hereditary Breast Cancer Genetic Services: Are Changes Reflected in the Knowledge and Clinical Practices of Florida Providers?

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Courtney Scherr; Lucia Camperlengo; Susan T Vadaparampil; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2016-08-15

10.  A statewide survey of practitioners to assess knowledge and clinical practices regarding hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Deborah Cragun; Courtney Lewis; Andrea Doty; Maria Rodriguez; Cristi Radford; Zachary Thompson; Jongphil Kim; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.