Literature DB >> 18989677

Role of broadcast harmonics in echo delay perception by big brown bats.

Sarah A Stamper1, Mary E Bates, Douglas Benedicto, James A Simmons.   

Abstract

Big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) emit frequency-modulated (FM) echolocation sounds containing two principal down-sweeping harmonics (FM(1) approximately 55-25 kHz, FM(2) approximately 105-50 kHz). To determine whether each harmonic contributes to perception of echo delay, bats were trained to discriminate between "split-harmonic" echoes that differed in delay. The bat's broadcasts were picked up with microphones, and FM(1) and FM(2) were separated with highpass and lowpass filters at about 55 kHz, where they overlap in frequency. Both harmonics then were delivered from loudspeakers as positive stimuli in a 2-choice delay discrimination procedure with FM(1) delayed 3.16 ms and FM(2) delayed 3.46 ms (300 mus delay split). Negative stimuli contained FM(1) and FM(2) with the same filtering but no delay separation. These were presented at different overall delays from 11 down to 3 ms to measure the bat's delay discrimination acuity for each harmonic in the split harmonic echoes. The bats determined the delays of both FM(1) and FM(2), but performance was overlaid by a broad pedestal of poor performance that extended for 800 micros. Splitting the harmonics by 300 micros appears to defocus the bat's representation of delay, revealing the existence of a process for recognizing the normally simultaneous occurrence of the harmonics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18989677     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-008-0384-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  16 in total

1.  Sonar gain control and echo detection thresholds in the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; A J Moffat; W M Masters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A modeling approach to explain pulse design in bats.

Authors:  Arjan Boonman; Joachim Ostwald
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Understanding signal design during the pursuit of aerial insects by echolocating bats: tools and applications.

Authors:  Marc W Holderied; Chris J Baker; Michele Vespe; Gareth Jones
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  Echolocation and passive listening by foraging mouse-eared bats Myotis myotis and M. blythii.

Authors:  Danilo Russo; Gareth Jones; Raphaël Arlettaz
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  The resolution of target range by echolocating bats.

Authors:  J A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M B Fenton; M J O'Farrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Automatic gain control in the bat's sonar receiver and the neuroethology of echolocation.

Authors:  S A Kick; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Echo delay versus spectral cues for temporal hyperacuity in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M J Ferragamo; M I Sanderson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Delay accuracy in bat sonar is related to the reciprocal of normalized echo bandwidth, or Q.

Authors:  James A Simmons; Nicola Neretti; Nathan Intrator; Richard A Altes; Michael J Ferragamo; Mark I Sanderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Biosonar signals impinging on the target during interception by big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  Prestor A Saillant; James A Simmons; Frederick H Bouffard; David N Lee; Steven P Dear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  FM echolocating bats shift frequencies to avoid broadcast-echo ambiguity in clutter.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Mary E Bates; James A Simmons; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Perception of echo delay is disrupted by small temporal misalignment of echo harmonics in bat sonar.

Authors:  Mary E Bates; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  Temporal binding of neural responses for focused attention in biosonar.

Authors:  James A Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Effects of filtering of harmonics from biosonar echoes on delay acuity by big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus).

Authors:  Mary E Bates; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A comprehensive computational model of animal biosonar signal processing.

Authors:  Chen Ming; Stephanie Haro; Andrea Megela Simmons; James A Simmons
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  The electrocardiogram signal of Seba's short-tailed bat, Carollia perspicillata.

Authors:  Diana Mihova; Julio C Hechavarría
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Target shape perception and clutter rejection use the same mechanism in bat sonar.

Authors:  Michaela Warnecke; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Intensity and directionality of bat echolocation signals.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Signe Brinkløv; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.