Literature DB >> 1556314

Sonar gain control and echo detection thresholds in the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

J A Simmons1, A J Moffat, W M Masters.   

Abstract

The echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus, detects sonar echoes with a sensitivity that changes according to the time elapsed between broadcasting of each sonar signal and reception of echoes. When tested in an electronic target simulator on a two-choice echo-detection task, the bat's threshold improved by 11.5 dB as echo delay changed from 2.3 to 4.6 ms (target ranges of 40 and 80 cm). Earlier experiments measured the change in detection threshold for delays from 1 to 6.4 ms (target ranges from about 17 to 110 cm) and obtained about 11 dB of improvement per doubling of delay. The new experiments used electronic delay lines to simulate echo delay, thus avoiding movement of loudspeakers to different distances and the possible creation of delay-dependent backward masking between stimulus echoes and cluttering echoes from the loudspeaker surfaces. The slope of the threshold shift defines an echo gain control that keeps echoes from point targets at a fixed sensation level--reducing sensitivity by 11 to 12 dB as echo amplitude increases by 12 dB per halving of range during the bat's approach to the target. A recent experiment using loudness discrimination of echoes at 70 to 80 dB SPL (roughly 50 dB above threshold) found a slope of about 6 dB per halving of range, so the gain-control effect may be level dependent. The observed effect is operationally equivalent to forward masking of echoes by the transmission, but any events correlated with vocalization which impair hearing sensitivity for a short interval following transmissions could cause a decline in sensitivity to echoes. Contractions of the bat's middle-ear muscles synchronized to transmissions may account for the observed threshold shift, at least for a span of echo delays associated with the most critical portion of the approach stage of pursuit. Forward masking by the sonar transmissions may contribute to the threshold shift, too, but middle-ear muscle contractions do occur and must be a significant part of the cause.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1556314     DOI: 10.1121/1.402641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Keeping returns optimal: gain control exerted through sensitivity adjustments in the harbour porpoise auditory system.

Authors:  Meike Linnenschmidt; Kristian Beedholm; Magnus Wahlberg; Jakob Højer-Kristensen; Paul E Nachtigall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Sensory acquisition in active sensing systems.

Authors:  M E Nelson; M A MacIver
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The acuity of echolocation: Spatial resolution in the sighted compared to expert performance.

Authors:  Santani Teng; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis Impair Blind       Date:  2011-01

4.  Integration time for short broad band clicks in echolocating FM-bats (Eptesicus fuscus).

Authors:  A Surlykke; O Bojesen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Echo SPL influences the ranging performance of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  A Denzinger; H U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Role of broadcast harmonics in echo delay perception by big brown bats.

Authors:  Sarah A Stamper; Mary E Bates; Douglas Benedicto; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Spatial unmasking in the echolocating Big Brown Bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  Susan Sümer; Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Interpulse interval modulation by echolocating big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) in different densities of obstacle clutter.

Authors:  Anthony E Petrites; Oliver S Eng; Donald S Mowlds; James A Simmons; Caroline M DeLong
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Cognitive adaptation of sonar gain control in the bottlenose dolphin.

Authors:  Laura N Kloepper; Adam B Smith; Paul E Nachtigall; John R Buck; James A Simmons; Aude F Pacini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Human echolocators adjust loudness and number of clicks for detection of reflectors at various azimuth angles.

Authors:  L Thaler; R De Vos; D Kish; M Antoniou; C Baker; M Hornikx
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.349

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.