Literature DB >> 17170159

Echolocation and passive listening by foraging mouse-eared bats Myotis myotis and M. blythii.

Danilo Russo1, Gareth Jones, Raphaël Arlettaz.   

Abstract

The two sibling mouse-eared bats, Myotis myotis and M. blythii, cope with similar orientation tasks, but separate their trophic niche by hunting in species-specific foraging microhabitats. Previous work has shown that both species rely largely on passive listening to detect and glean prey from substrates, and studies on other bat species have suggested that echolocation is ;switched off' during passive listening. We tested the hypothesis that mouse-eared bats continuously emit echolocation calls while approaching prey. Echolocation may be needed for orientation while simultaneously listening for prey. Because these sibling species forage in different microhabitats and eat different prey, we also compared their echolocation behaviour and related it to their ecology. Both species used echolocation throughout prey approach, corroborating a functional role for echolocation during gleaning. Captive bats of both species emitted similar orientation calls, and pulse rate increased during prey approach. Between the search to approach phases, call amplitude showed a sudden, dramatic drop and bats adopted ;whispering echolocation' by emitting weak calls. Whispering echolocation may reduce the risks of masking prey-generated sounds during passive listening, the mouse-eared bats' main detection tactic; it may also avoid alerting ultrasound-sensitive prey. In several cases M. myotis emitted a loud buzz made of 2-18 components when landing. We hypothesise that the buzz, absent in M. blythii at least when gleaning from the same substrate, is used to assess the distance from ground and refine the landing manoeuvre. Our findings have implications for niche separation between sibling species of echolocating bats, support a role for echolocation during passive listening and suggest a functional role for buzzes in landing control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17170159     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  15 in total

1.  Variability of the approach phase of landing echolocating Greater Mouse-eared bats.

Authors:  Mariana L Melcón; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler; Annette Denzinger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Fast sensory-motor reactions in echolocating bats to sudden changes during the final buzz and prey intercept.

Authors:  Cornelia Geberl; Signe Brinkløv; Lutz Wiegrebe; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Divergent trophic levels in two cryptic sibling bat species.

Authors:  Björn M Siemers; Stefan Greif; Ivailo Borissov; Silke L Voigt-Heucke; Christian C Voigt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Hemprich's long-eared bat (Otonycteris hemprichii) as a predator of scorpions: whispering echolocation, passive gleaning and prey selection.

Authors:  Marc Holderied; Carmi Korine; Thorsten Moritz
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Role of broadcast harmonics in echo delay perception by big brown bats.

Authors:  Sarah A Stamper; Mary E Bates; Douglas Benedicto; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Behavioral responses of big brown bats to dives by praying mantises.

Authors:  Kaushik Ghose; Jeffrey D Triblehorn; Kari Bohn; David D Yager; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Flying in silence: Echolocating bats cease vocalizing to avoid sonar jamming.

Authors:  Chen Chiu; Wei Xian; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The cercal organ may provide singing tettigoniids a backup sensory system for the detection of eavesdropping bats.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Elisabeth Ofner; Viktoria Grossauer; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Foraging ecology predicts learning performance in insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Theresa M A Clarin; Ireneusz Ruczyński; Rachel A Page; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Perception of silent and motionless prey on vegetation by echolocation in the gleaning bat Micronycteris microtis.

Authors:  Inga Geipel; Kirsten Jung; Elisabeth K V Kalko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.