Literature DB >> 21228198

Perception of echo delay is disrupted by small temporal misalignment of echo harmonics in bat sonar.

Mary E Bates1, James A Simmons.   

Abstract

Echolocating big brown bats emit ultrasonic frequency-modulated (FM) biosonar sounds containing two prominent downward-sweeping harmonics (FM1 and FM2) and perceive target distance from echo delay. In naturally occurring echoes, FM1 and FM2 are delayed by the same amount. Even though echoes from targets located off-axis or far away are lowpass filtered, which weakens FM2 relative to FM1, their delays remain the same. We show here that misalignment of FM2 with FM1 by only 2.6 μs is sufficient to significantly disrupt acuity, which then persists for larger misalignments up to 300 μs. However, when FM2 is eliminated entirely rather than just misaligned, acuity is effectively restored. For naturally occurring, lowpass-filtered echoes, neuronal responses to weakened FM2 are retarded relative to FM1 because of amplitude-latency trading, which misaligns the harmonics in the bat's internal auditory representations. Electronically delaying FM2 relative to FM1 mimics the retarded neuronal responses for FM2 relative to FM1 caused by amplitude-latency trading. Echoes with either electronically or physiologically misaligned harmonics are not perceived as having a clearly defined delay. This virtual collapse of delay acuity may suppress interference from off-axis or distant clutter through degradation of delay images for clutter in contrast to sharp images for nearer, frontal targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21228198      PMCID: PMC3020147          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.048983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  35 in total

1.  Discrimination of jittered sonar echoes by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus: the shape of target images in echolocation.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M Ferragamo; C F Moss; S B Stevenson; R A Altes
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  The spectrogram correlation and transformation receiver, revisited.

Authors:  H Peremans; J Hallam
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustic information available to bats using frequency-modulated sounds for the perception of insect prey.

Authors:  C F Moss; M Zagaeski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Frequency tuning and response latencies at three levels in the brainstem of the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  S Haplea; E Covey; J H Casseday
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Frequency tuning, latencies, and responses to frequency-modulated sweeps in the inferior colliculus of the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  M J Ferragamo; T Haresign; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Tonotopic and functional organization in the auditory cortex of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  S P Dear; J Fritz; T Haresign; M Ferragamo; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A computational model of echo processing and acoustic imaging in frequency-modulated echolocating bats: the spectrogram correlation and transformation receiver.

Authors:  P A Saillant; J A Simmons; S P Dear; T A McMullen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Convergence of temporal and spectral information into acoustic images of complex sonar targets perceived by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; C F Moss; M Ferragamo
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  The brain-stem auditory-evoked response in the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus) to clicks and frequency-modulated sweeps.

Authors:  R Burkard; C F Moss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Echo-delay resolution in sonar images of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M J Ferragamo; C F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Temporal binding of neural responses for focused attention in biosonar.

Authors:  James A Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Target shape perception and clutter rejection use the same mechanism in bat sonar.

Authors:  Michaela Warnecke; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Echolocation of static and moving objects in two-dimensional space using bat-like frequency-modulation sound.

Authors:  Ikuo Matsuo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Size constancy in bat biosonar? Perceptual interaction of object aperture and distance.

Authors:  Melina Heinrich; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.