Literature DB >> 20707464

Effects of filtering of harmonics from biosonar echoes on delay acuity by big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus).

Mary E Bates1, James A Simmons.   

Abstract

Big brown bats emit FM biosonar sounds containing two principal harmonics (FM1 approximately 55-22 kHz;FM2 approximately 105-45 kHz). To examine the role of harmonics, they were selectively filtered from stimuli in electronic-echo delay discrimination experiments. Positive stimuli were delayed by 3.16 ms (55 cm simulated target range); negative stimuli were by delayed by 3.96 ms (68 cm). This large 800-micros delay difference (nearly 14 cm) was easily discriminated for echoes containing equal-strength FM1 and FM2. Performance gradually decreased as highpass filters removed progressively larger segments from FM1. For echoes with FM2 alone, performance collapsed to chance, but performance remained good for lowpass echoes containing FM1 alone. Attenuation of FM2 by 3 dB relative to FM1 also decreased performance, but shortening electronic delay of the attenuated FM2 by 48 micros counteracted amplitude-latency trading and restored performance. Bats require the auditory representations of FM1 and FM2 to be in temporal register for high delay acuity. Misalignment of neuronal responses degrades acuity, but outright removal of FM2, leaving only FM1, causes little loss of acuity. Functional asymmetry of harmonics reflects lowpass effects from beaming and atmospheric propagation, which leave FM1 intact. It may cooperate with latency shifts to aid in suppression of clutter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20707464      PMCID: PMC2933264          DOI: 10.1121/1.3459823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  27 in total

1.  FM echolocating bats shift frequencies to avoid broadcast-echo ambiguity in clutter.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Mary E Bates; James A Simmons; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Range discrimination by big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) using altered model echoes: implications for signal processing.

Authors:  W M Masters; K A Raver
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory.

Authors:  A Surlykke; C F Moss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perception of echo phase information in bat sonar.

Authors:  J A Simmons
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The resolution of target range by echolocating bats.

Authors:  J A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Echolocation in bats: signal processing of echoes for target range.

Authors:  J A Simmons
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Selectivity for echo spectral interference and delay in the auditory cortex of the big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  Mark I Sanderson; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Time and Frequency domain processing in the inferior colliculus of echolocating bats.

Authors:  R D Bodenhamer; G D Pollak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Delay accuracy in bat sonar is related to the reciprocal of normalized echo bandwidth, or Q.

Authors:  James A Simmons; Nicola Neretti; Nathan Intrator; Richard A Altes; Michael J Ferragamo; Mark I Sanderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Detection of prey in a cluttered environment by the northern bat Eptesicus nilssonii.

Authors:  M E Jensen; L A Miller; J Rydell
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  4 in total

1.  Perception of echo delay is disrupted by small temporal misalignment of echo harmonics in bat sonar.

Authors:  Mary E Bates; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Temporal binding of neural responses for focused attention in biosonar.

Authors:  James A Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  A comprehensive computational model of animal biosonar signal processing.

Authors:  Chen Ming; Stephanie Haro; Andrea Megela Simmons; James A Simmons
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Target shape perception and clutter rejection use the same mechanism in bat sonar.

Authors:  Michaela Warnecke; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 1.836

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.