Literature DB >> 25122915

Temporal binding of neural responses for focused attention in biosonar.

James A Simmons1.   

Abstract

Big brown bats emit biosonar sounds and perceive their surroundings from the delays of echoes received by the ears. Broadcasts are frequency modulated (FM) and contain two prominent harmonics sweeping from 50 to 25 kHz (FM1) and from 100 to 50 kHz (FM2). Individual frequencies in each broadcast and each echo evoke single-spike auditory responses. Echo delay is encoded by the time elapsed between volleys of responses to broadcasts and volleys of responses to echoes. If echoes have the same spectrum as broadcasts, the volley of neural responses to FM1 and FM2 is internally synchronized for each sound, which leads to sharply focused delay images. Because of amplitude-latency trading, disruption of response synchrony within the volleys occurs if the echoes are lowpass filtered, leading to blurred, defocused delay images. This effect is consistent with the temporal binding hypothesis for perceptual image formation. Bats perform inexplicably well in cluttered surroundings where echoes from off-side objects ought to cause masking. Off-side echoes are lowpass filtered because of the shape of the broadcast beam, and they evoke desynchronized auditory responses. The resulting defocused images of clutter do not mask perception of focused images for targets. Neural response synchronization may select a target to be the focus of attention, while desynchronization may impose inattention on the surroundings by defocusing perception of clutter. The formation of focused biosonar images from synchronized neural responses, and the defocusing that occurs with disruption of synchrony, quantitatively demonstrates how temporal binding may control attention and bring a perceptual object into existence.
© 2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amplitude–latency trading; Attention; Biosonar; Echo delay; Echolocating bats; Neural response latency; Perceived images; Temporal binding

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25122915      PMCID: PMC4132564          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.104380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  48 in total

1.  FM echolocating bats shift frequencies to avoid broadcast-echo ambiguity in clutter.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Mary E Bates; James A Simmons; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A spatial explanation for synchrony biases in perceptual grouping: consequences for the temporal-binding hypothesis.

Authors:  Guy Waliis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-02

Review 3.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D J Felleman; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  The resolution of target range by echolocating bats.

Authors:  J A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A numerical study of the role of the tragus in the big brown bat.

Authors:  Rolf Müller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Neural synchrony in cortical networks: history, concept and current status.

Authors:  Peter J Uhlhaas; Gordon Pipa; Bruss Lima; Lucia Melloni; Sergio Neuenschwander; Danko Nikolić; Wolf Singer
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-30

7.  Interpulse interval modulation by echolocating big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) in different densities of obstacle clutter.

Authors:  Anthony E Petrites; Oliver S Eng; Donald S Mowlds; James A Simmons; Caroline M DeLong
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Echolocating bats cry out loud to detect their prey.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Elisabeth K V Kalko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Biosonar resolving power: echo-acoustic perception of surface structures in the submillimeter range.

Authors:  Ralph Simon; Mirjam Knörnschild; Marco Tschapka; Annkathrin Schneider; Nadine Passauer; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Otto von Helversen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  What a plant sounds like: the statistics of vegetation echoes as received by echolocating bats.

Authors:  Yossi Yovel; Peter Stilz; Matthias O Franz; Arjan Boonman; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  8 in total

1.  Big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) reveal diverse strategies for sonar target tracking in clutter.

Authors:  Beatrice Mao; Murat Aytekin; Gerald S Wilkinson; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A comprehensive computational model of animal biosonar signal processing.

Authors:  Chen Ming; Stephanie Haro; Andrea Megela Simmons; James A Simmons
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 3.  Neural Processing of Naturalistic Echolocation Signals in Bats.

Authors:  M Jerome Beetz; Julio C Hechavarría
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.342

4.  Effective biosonar echo-to-clutter rejection ratio in a complex dynamic scene.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Knowles; Jonathan R Barchi; Jason E Gaudette; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Target shape perception and clutter rejection use the same mechanism in bat sonar.

Authors:  Michaela Warnecke; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Avoidance of non-localizable obstacles in echolocating bats: A robotic model.

Authors:  Carl Bou Mansour; Elijah Koreman; Jan Steckel; Herbert Peremans; Dieter Vanderelst
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Echolocating Big Brown Bats, Eptesicus fuscus, Modulate Pulse Intervals to Overcome Range Ambiguity in Cluttered Surroundings.

Authors:  Alyssa R Wheeler; Kara A Fulton; Jason E Gaudette; Ryan A Simmons; Ikuo Matsuo; James A Simmons
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Robustness of cortical and subcortical processing in the presence of natural masking sounds.

Authors:  M Jerome Beetz; Francisco García-Rosales; Manfred Kössl; Julio C Hechavarría
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.