Literature DB >> 18989103

Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation.

Amy J Bastian1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Understanding the behavioral mechanisms of sensorimotor adaptation and learning is essential for designing rational rehabilitation interventions. RECENT
FINDINGS: Adaptation is the trial-and-error process of adjusting movement to new demands and is now thought to be more than a simple error cancellation process. Instead, it may calibrate the brain's prediction of how the body will move and takes into account costs associated with the new task demand. Damage of the cerebellum systematically disrupts adaptation, but damage to other brain regions often does not. Adapting to perturbations driven by a device like a robot or a treadmill leads to only partial generalization to unconstrained 'real-world' movements. Repeated adaptation can lead to learning a new motor calibration, but process of consolidation of this type of learning is less understood in patients.
SUMMARY: Adaptation is inherently important for rehabilitation by making movement flexible, but can also be used to ascertain whether some patients can generate a more normal motor pattern. Repeated adaptation can lead to learning of a new, more permanent motor calibration. Though less understood, this type of learning is likely to be an important method for making long-term improvements in patients' movement patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18989103      PMCID: PMC2954436          DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328315a293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol        ISSN: 1350-7540            Impact factor:   5.710


  43 in total

1.  Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks.

Authors:  Graham Caithness; Rieko Osu; Paul Bays; Henry Chase; Jessica Klassen; Mitsuo Kawato; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Scaling down motor memories: de-adaptation after motor learning.

Authors:  Paul R Davidson; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Throwing while looking through prisms. II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze-throw calibrations.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning.

Authors:  C M Harris; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Y Rossetti; G Rode; L Pisella; A Farné; L Li; D Boisson; M T Perenin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Adaptation motor learning of arm movements in patients with cerebellar disease.

Authors:  G Deuschl; C Toro; T Zeffiro; S Massaquoi; M Hallett
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Ocular motor disorders associated with cerebellar lesions: pathophysiology and topical localization.

Authors:  R F Lewis; D S Zee
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.607

9.  Consolidation in human motor memory.

Authors:  T Brashers-Krug; R Shadmehr; E Bizzi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Cerebellar control of postural scaling and central set in stance.

Authors:  F B Horak; H C Diener
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  147 in total

1.  Nonhomogeneous transfer reveals specificity in speech motor learning.

Authors:  Amélie Rochet-Capellan; Lara Richer; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  How does the motor system correct for errors in time and space during locomotor adaptation?

Authors:  Laura A Malone; Amy J Bastian; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Tactile exploration of virtual objects for blind and sighted people: the role of beta 1 EEG band in sensory substitution and supramodal mental mapping.

Authors:  C Campus; L Brayda; F De Carli; R Chellali; F Famà; C Bruzzo; L Lucagrossi; G Rodriguez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Linear hypergeneralization of learned dynamics across movement speeds reveals anisotropic, gain-encoding primitives for motor adaptation.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Obafunso Ajayi; Gary C Sing; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Natural error patterns enable transfer of motor learning to novel contexts.

Authors:  Gelsy Torres-Oviedo; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Propulsive Forces Applied to the Body's Center of Mass Affect Metabolic Energetics Poststroke.

Authors:  Kelly Penke; Korre Scott; Yunna Sinskey; Michael D Lewek
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Older adults learn less, but still reduce metabolic cost, during motor adaptation.

Authors:  Helen J Huang; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Proprioceptive feedback and preferred patterns of human movement.

Authors:  Jesse C Dean
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.230

Review 9.  Pediatric Stroke: Unique Implications of the Immature Brain on Injury and Recovery.

Authors:  Laura A Malone; Ryan J Felling
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.372

10.  Vision can recalibrate the vestibular reafference signal used to re-establish postural equilibrium following a platform perturbation.

Authors:  Adam J Toth; Laurence R Harris; John Zettel; Leah R Bent
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.