Literature DB >> 20881197

Linear hypergeneralization of learned dynamics across movement speeds reveals anisotropic, gain-encoding primitives for motor adaptation.

Wilsaan M Joiner1, Obafunso Ajayi, Gary C Sing, Maurice A Smith.   

Abstract

The ability to generalize learned motor actions to new contexts is a key feature of the motor system. For example, the ability to ride a bicycle or swing a racket is often first developed at lower speeds and later applied to faster velocities. A number of previous studies have examined the generalization of motor adaptation across movement directions and found that the learned adaptation decays in a pattern consistent with the existence of motor primitives that display narrow Gaussian tuning. However, few studies have examined the generalization of motor adaptation across movement speeds. Following adaptation to linear velocity-dependent dynamics during point-to-point reaching arm movements at one speed, we tested the ability of subjects to transfer this adaptation to short-duration higher-speed movements aimed at the same target. We found near-perfect linear extrapolation of the trained adaptation with respect to both the magnitude and the time course of the velocity profiles associated with the high-speed movements: a 69% increase in movement speed corresponded to a 74% extrapolation of the trained adaptation. The close match between the increase in movement speed and the corresponding increase in adaptation beyond what was trained indicates linear hypergeneralization. Computational modeling shows that this pattern of linear hypergeneralization across movement speeds is not compatible with previous models of adaptation in which motor primitives display isotropic Gaussian tuning of motor output around their preferred velocities. Instead, we show that this generalization pattern indicates that the primitives involved in the adaptation to viscous dynamics display anisotropic tuning in velocity space and encode the gain between motor output and motion state rather than motor output itself.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20881197      PMCID: PMC3023379          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00884.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  56 in total

1.  Planning movements in a simple redundant task.

Authors:  Philipp Vetter; Tamar Flash; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Evidence for an eye-centered spherical representation of the visuomotor map.

Authors:  P Vetter; S J Goodbody; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Generalization of dynamics learning across changes in movement amplitude.

Authors:  Andrew A G Mattar; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Computational motor control in humans and robots.

Authors:  Stefan Schaal; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Adaptation and generalization in acceleration-dependent force fields.

Authors:  Eun Jung Hwang; Maurice A Smith; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Primate frontal eye fields. I. Single neurons discharging before saccades.

Authors:  C J Bruce; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Size and distribution of movement fields in the monkey superior colliculus.

Authors:  D L Sparks; R Holland; B L Guthrie
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-20       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Reduction in learning rates associated with anterograde interference results from interactions between different timescales in motor adaptation.

Authors:  Gary C Sing; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  22 in total

1.  How is a motor skill learned? Change and invariance at the levels of task success and trajectory control.

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; John W Krakauer; Pietro Mazzoni
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The generalization of visuomotor learning to untrained movements and movement sequences based on movement vector and goal location remapping.

Authors:  Howard G Wu; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The training schedule affects the stability, not the magnitude, of the interlimb transfer of learned dynamics.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Flexible Control of Safety Margins for Action Based on Environmental Variability.

Authors:  Alkis M Hadjiosif; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The 24-h savings of adaptation to novel movement dynamics initially reflects the recall of previous performance.

Authors:  Katrina P Nguyen; Weiwei Zhou; Erin McKenna; Katrina Colucci-Chang; Laurence C Jayet Bray; Eghbal A Hosseini; Laith Alhussein; Meena Rezazad; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Using dual tasks to test immediate transfer of training between naturalistic movements: a proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Gone in 0.6 seconds: the encoding of motor memories depends on recent sensorimotor states.

Authors:  Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; David W Franklin; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability.

Authors:  Howard G Wu; Yohsuke R Miyamoto; Luis Nicolas Gonzalez Castro; Bence P Ölveczky; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Generalizing movement patterns following shoulder fixation.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Maeda; Julia M Zdybal; Paul L Gribble; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Representing delayed force feedback as a combination of current and delayed states.

Authors:  Guy Avraham; Firas Mawase; Amir Karniel; Lior Shmuelof; Opher Donchin; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.