Literature DB >> 27752729

Vision can recalibrate the vestibular reafference signal used to re-establish postural equilibrium following a platform perturbation.

Adam J Toth1, Laurence R Harris2, John Zettel1, Leah R Bent3.   

Abstract

Visuo-vestibular recalibration, in which visual information is used to alter the interpretation of vestibular signals, has been shown to influence both oculomotor control and navigation. Here we investigate whether vision can recalibrate the vestibular feedback used during the re-establishment of equilibrium following a perturbation. The perturbation recovery responses of nine participants were examined following exposure to a period of 11 s of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS). During GVS in VISION trials, occlusion spectacles provided 4 s of visual information that enabled participants to correct for the GVS-induced tilt and associate this asymmetric vestibular signal with a visually provided 'upright'. NoVISION trials had no such visual experience. Participants used the visual information to assist in realigning their posture compared to when visual information was not provided (p < 0.01). The initial recovery response to a platform perturbation was not impacted by whether vision had been provided during the preceding GVS, as determined by peak centre of mass and pressure deviations (p = 0.09). However, after using vision to reinterpret the vestibular signal during GVS, final centre of mass and pressure equilibrium positions were significantly shifted compared to trials in which vision was not available (p < 0.01). These findings support previous work identifying a prominent role of vestibular input for re-establishing postural equilibrium following a perturbation. Our work is the first to highlight the capacity for visual feedback to recalibrate the vertical interpretation of vestibular reafference for re-establishing equilibrium following a perturbation. This demonstrates the rapid adaptability of the vestibular reafference signal for postural control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Equilibrium; Perturbation; Sensory integration; Vestibular; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27752729     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4801-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  The timing of galvanic vestibular stimulation affects responses to platform translation.

Authors:  F Hlavacka; C L Shupert; F B Horak
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1999-03-06       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Vestibular stimulation affects medium latency postural muscle responses.

Authors:  Fay B Horak; Frantisek Hlavacka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation.

Authors:  Clare Press; Marisa Taylor-Clarke; Steffan Kennett; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Otolith and canal reflexes in human standing.

Authors:  Ian Cathers; Brian L Day; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Interactions of touch feedback with muscle vibration and galvanic vestibular stimulation in the control of trunk posture.

Authors:  E Maaswinkel; H E J Veeger; J Hv Dieen
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Responses of vestibular-nerve afferents in the squirrel monkey to externally applied galvanic currents.

Authors:  J M Goldberg; C Fernández; C E Smith
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Role of somatosensory and vestibular cues in attenuating visually induced human postural sway.

Authors:  R J Peterka; M S Benolken
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Postural threat differentially affects the feedforward and feedback components of the vestibular-evoked balance response.

Authors:  Callum J Osler; M C A Tersteeg; Raymond F Reynolds; Ian D Loram
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Sensorimotor recalibration depends on attribution of sensory prediction errors to internal causes.

Authors:  Carlo Wilke; Matthis Synofzik; Axel Lindner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Postural Control in Bilateral Vestibular Failure: Its Relation to Visual, Proprioceptive, Vestibular, and Cognitive Input.

Authors:  Andreas Sprenger; Jann F Wojak; Nico M Jandl; Christoph Helmchen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.003

2.  Investigating sex differences, cognitive effort, strategy, and performance on a computerised version of the mental rotations test via eye tracking.

Authors:  Adam J Toth; Mark J Campbell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Incongruity of Geometric and Spectral Markers in the Assessment of Body Sway.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Shashank Ghai; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Adaptation of balancing behaviour during continuous perturbations of stance. Supra-postural visual tasks and platform translation frequency modulate adaptation rate.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Antonio Nardone; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.