Literature DB >> 8813283

Throwing while looking through prisms. II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze-throw calibrations.

T A Martin1, J G Keating, H P Goodkin, A J Bastian, W T Thach.   

Abstract

Human subjects threw balls of clay at a visual target while looking through wedge prism spectacles. In studies of short-term adjustment, subjects threw in the direction of their prism-bent gaze, missing the target to that side. Within 10-30 throws, they gradually adapted with a wider gaze-throw angle and hit the target. Immediately after removal of the prisms the wide gaze-throw angle persisted and throws missed the target to the opposite side, the so-called 'negative after effect'. Repeated throws were required to adapt back to the normal gaze-throw angle and hit the target. The adaptation was specific both to the body parts trained and the type of throw trained: training with the right hand did not generalize to throwing with the left; overhand training seldom generalized to underhand throwing. In a study of long-term adjustment, two subjects threw with the same hand (right) and the same type of throw (overhand) alternately, with and without prisms, over a period of 6 weeks. They gradually learned to hit the target on the first throw, with and without prisms. The two gaze-throw calibrations (prism and no-prism) were retained for > 27 months. The long-term adjustment was shown to consist of a coordinated relationship of eye-in-head, head-on-trunk and trunk-on-arm angles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8813283     DOI: 10.1093/brain/119.4.1199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  153 in total

1.  Motor learning through the combination of primitives.

Authors:  F A Mussa-Ivaldi; E Bizzi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Learning motor synergies makes use of information on muscular load.

Authors:  J Fernández-Ruiz; C Hall-Haro; R Díaz; J Mischner; P Vergara; J C Lopez-Garcia
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Prism adaptation and aftereffect: specifying the properties of a procedural memory system.

Authors:  J Fernández-Ruiz; R Díaz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Environmental experience within and across testing days determines the strength of human visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Semrau; Amy L Daitch; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Vergence-dependent adaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  Richard F Lewis; Richard A Clendaniel; David S Zee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Context-dependent adaptation of visually-guided arm movements and vestibular eye movements: role of the cerebellum.

Authors:  Richard F Lewis
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Proprioceptive recalibration in the right and left hands following abrupt visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Danielle Salomonczyk; Denise Y P Henriques; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Beside the point: motor adaptation without feedback-based error correction in task-irrelevant conditions.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Iris L Shelly; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Learning to Reach to Locations Encoded from Imaging Displays.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Roberta L Klatzky; George Stetten
Journal:  Spat Cogn Comput       Date:  2008-10

10.  Seeing the Errors You Feel Enhances Locomotor Performance but Not Learning.

Authors:  Ryan T Roemmich; Andrew W Long; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.