Literature DB >> 15488303

Scaling down motor memories: de-adaptation after motor learning.

Paul R Davidson1, Daniel M Wolpert.   

Abstract

Although adaptation to novel motor tasks is sometimes a very slow process, de-adaptation is usually extremely rapid. Such rapid de-adaptation is seen in dynamic learning in which subjects can take hundreds of movements to learn a novel force environment but only a few movements to de-adapt back to a normal or "null" force environment. We investigated whether this effect is unique to the null environment or reveals a more general rapid adaptation mechanism by studying how subjects behave when their dynamic environment changes. We observed that after learning a dynamic force field, subjects took longer to de-adapt when the forces were turned off than to adapt to a novel scaled-down version of the experienced field. This demonstrates that rapid adaptation is not unique to the "null" force environment. Moreover, we examined subjects' ability to adapt from a learned field to either a scaled down field or to a field in which the sign of the forces changed. Even though in both conditions the required change in force output was identical, subjects were significantly faster at adapting to the scaled down field. The result suggests that rapid de-adaptation reflects a capacity to scale down the relative contribution of existing control modules to the motor output.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15488303     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  16 in total

1.  Intermanual transfer characteristics of dynamic learning: direction, coordinate frame, and consolidation of interlimb generalization.

Authors:  Christian Stockinger; Benjamin Thürer; Anne Focke; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Locomotor control of limb force switches from minimal intervention principle in early adaptation to noise reduction in late adaptation.

Authors:  Brian P Selgrade; Young-Hui Chang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A reward-modulated hebbian learning rule can explain experimentally observed network reorganization in a brain control task.

Authors:  Robert Legenstein; Steven M Chase; Andrew B Schwartz; Wolfgang Maass
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A long-memory model of motor learning in the saccadic system: a regime-switching approach.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.710

6.  Reduction in learning rates associated with anterograde interference results from interactions between different timescales in motor adaptation.

Authors:  Gary C Sing; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Modulation of internal model formation during force field-induced motor learning by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Timothy Hunter; Paul Sacco; Michael A Nitsche; Duncan L Turner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Measuring adaptation with a sinusoidal perturbation function.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  A single-rate context-dependent learning process underlies rapid adaptation to familiar object dynamics.

Authors:  James N Ingram; Ian S Howard; J Randall Flanagan; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Estimating the relevance of world disturbances to explain savings, interference and long-term motor adaptation effects.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.